• Every SOC analyst knows the frustration. Your SIEM generates hundreds, sometimes thousands of alerts daily.

    Each alert demands attention, but with limited time and resources, how do you prioritize effectively? Investigating each alert in isolation leaves teams reactive, overwhelmed, and ultimately vulnerable to sophisticated attacks that blend into the background noise. 

    The Alert Triage Dilemma: Drowning in Data, Starving for Context 

    The challenge isn’t just volume; it’s context. An IP address flagged in your network might seem innocuous until you discover it’s been actively targeting companies in your industry for weeks.

    A file hash that appears benign could be part of a broader campaign that’s already compromised your competitors. Without this broader intelligence picture, even skilled analysts operate with one hand tied behind their back. 

    Threat actors can establish persistence, exfiltrate data, and disappear within hours, sometimes minutes. Your detection capabilities need to match this velocity, identifying threats not just accurately, but immediately upon first contact. 

    This is where the concept of collective defense becomes invaluable. While your organization may be seeing a particular indicator for the first time, the global security community may have encountered it repeatedly.  

    The challenge lies in accessing this collective knowledge in actionable, real-time formats that integrate seamlessly into your existing workflows. This is the challenge that services like ANY.RUN’s Threat Intelligence Lookup accept. 

    Threat Intelligence Lookup main page: search IOCs, explore TTPs, use YARA rules 

    Industry as a Target: You’re Not Alone in Their Crosshairs 

    Attackers rarely target individual companies in isolation. They target industries, supply chains, and geographic regions. If you’re in financial services and your competitors are under attack, you’re likely next.

    If you’re a healthcare provider and similar organizations in your region are being compromised, consider yourself on borrowed time. 

    Threat actors invest significant resources in understanding specific industry verticals, developing specialized tools and techniques optimized for particular business environments.

    Once they’ve honed their approach against one target in your sector, they’ll systematically apply these proven methods across similar organizations. 

    Why Outside Incident Data Is Priceless 

    Intelligence about attacks against industry peers isn’t just interesting context. It’s predictive intelligence.

    When analysts understand the complete scope of ongoing campaigns against their sector, they can proactively hunt for early indicators rather than wait for attacks to fully manifest in their environment.  

    Your SOC sees what happens in your network. But attackers are reusing domains, IPs, samples, and behaviors across many victims.

    Having access to incident data from other companies gives you a shortcut: instead of spending hours figuring out if an alert is malicious, you can check instantly against real-world attack data. 

    ANY.RUN Threat Intelligence Lookup: Instant IOC Validation 

    With Threat Intelligence Lookup, SOC analysts can: 

    • Enter an IOC (hash, IP, domain, URL, or file). 
    • Instantly see whether it appeared in real-world attacks observed across thousands of SOCs. 
    • Get context such as malware family, behavior, and timestamps of activity. 
    • Validate whether an alert points to a real, ongoing threat — or just background noise 

    This shifts alert triage from manual, time-consuming validation to fast, confident decision-making backed by live attack evidence. 

    Start using TI Lookup for free to make quick decisions on possible threats: Sign up to start.

    The source of the threat data explorable by TI Lookup is ANY.RUN’s Interactive Sandbox.

    It is used daily by over 15,000 SOCs worldwide: analysts at these organizations detonate suspicious files, investigate malware behavior, and analyze attack campaigns using ANY.RUN’s cloud-based environment. This creates an unprecedented repository of live attack intelligence. 

    For threat analysts and hunters, ANY.RUN’s Threat Intelligence Lookup provides: 

    • Faster triage: Instantly confirm whether an alert IOC is tied to a live attack. 
    • Reduced fatigue: Cut hours of manual investigation by checking IOCs in seconds. 
    • Higher detection confidence: Spot adversaries using the same infrastructure elsewhere. 
    • Better hunting: Pivot on related IOCs and uncover hidden connections in your environment. 
    • Collective defense: Leverage the insights of 15,000 SOCs worldwide to strengthen your own. 

    TI Lookup in Action: How to Use It 

    ANY.RUN’s Threat Intelligence Lookup is available on a free plan with limited search parameters allowing to complete basic analyst tasks.

    Let’s take the above-mentioned use case to see how it works: a dubious IP address detected in your system. Look it up and get an instant verdict:  

    An IP lookup results with a quick verdict and additional IOCs 

    We can see that the IP has been flagged as malicious and has been spotted in most recent incidents. For more context, we can switch to the “Analyses” tab and quickly discover that it belongs to Agent Tesla spyware:  

    destinationIP:”173.254.31.34″ 
     

    Malware samples analyzed in the Sandbox, found by IP search

    Premium Capabilities for Advanced Security Operations 

    When you are ready for a level-up, the Premium plan transforms TI Lookup into a comprehensive security intelligence platform: 

    • Advanced Search Operations: Over 40 search parameters with complex operators (AND, OR, NOT) enable precise threat hunting and investigation workflows. 
    • Complete Attack Visibility: Access to all available analysis sessions rather than just the 20 most recent, providing comprehensive historical context. 
    • Private Intelligence: Conduct confidential searches and investigations without visibility to other users, protecting sensitive security operations. 
    • Continuous Monitoring: Search Updates feature provides automated alerts when new threats match your specified criteria, ensuring your team stays ahead of emerging campaigns. 
    • Expert Analysis: TI Reports from ANY.RUN’s analyst team deliver strategic insights on attack trends and threat actor activities across industries. 

    Here is an example of a lookup search query you can use on Premium plan: more search parameters (registryKey, registryValue) and operators (NOT) are available; over 500 sandbox sessions found so that an analyst can observe certain malware behavior.   

    registryKey:”\Run$” AND registryValue:”.url$” NOT threatName:”darkvision” 

    Malware samples demonstrating certain behavior found via TI Lookup 

    Request full access to TI Lookup for actionable threat investigation: Contact ANY.RUN now 

    Embrace the Power of Collective Defense  

    The modern threat landscape demands a fundamental shift from isolated defense to collective intelligence. No single organization, regardless of size or resources, can match the comprehensive threat visibility that emerges from global collaboration.

    ANY.RUN’s Threat Intelligence Lookup represents this collaborative approach in action: instant access to intelligence derived from 15,000 SOCs struggling to analyze and understand active threats. 

    In a world where attackers share techniques, tools, and targets across the global threat landscape, defenders must respond with equal coordination and real-time intelligence sharing.

    ANY.RUN’s Threat Intelligence Lookup provides the immediate access infrastructure to make this collective defense practical and operational. 

    The post How to Enrich Alerts with Live Attack Data From 15K SOCs  appeared first on Cyber Security News.

    ¶¶¶¶¶

    ¶¶¶¶¶

    ¶¶¶¶¶

    ¶¶¶¶¶

    ¶¶¶¶¶

  • HONOLULU—”The Indo-Pacific is the priority theater of the United States of America.”

    This sentence, spoken Monday by U.S. Indo-Pacific Command leader Adm. Samuel Paparo, is a common refrain here on the island that’s home to not just INDOPACOM but U.S. Army Pacific, Pacific Fleet, Pacific Air Forces, Marine Corps Forces Pacific, and U.S. Space Forces-Indo-Pacific. 

    And despite reports that defending the homeland is the Pentagon’s new top priority, Paparo said he’s not concerned about a shift in attention. 

    “I'm not,” he said. “I mean, one, because the homeland is in the Pacific.” 

    Guam and the Northern Mariana Islands—both U.S. territories—are in the western Pacific, while Hawaii is in the central Pacific, Paparo said. And the U.S. operates under the Compacts of Free Association, he said, “a covenant between the United States, Palau, Federated States of Micronesia, Republic of Marshall Islands” under which the United States is “responsible for their national defense.” 

    “Defense in depth means the Pacific is a priority theater, because four of the five priority threats to the United States of America—to the security, freedom, and well-being of the United States—traverse the Indo-Pacific geography,” he said.

    The president of Palau, Surangel Whipps, said his country fell victim to a cyberattack they attribute to China shortly after renewing the COFA in March 2024. But, asked whether he was concerned about the possibility of the Trump administration turning inward and away from allies, Whipps said he believes the administration “is just trying to refocus and trying to find better ways that they can help us, and they’re carrying through on those commitments.” 

    Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth in June told the Senate Appropriations Committee that the Pentagon is operating under an interim National Defense Strategy “focused on defending the homeland,” because previous planning guidance “had the wrong priorities, or some of the wrong priorities.”

    ]]>

    ¶¶¶¶¶

    ¶¶¶¶¶

    ¶¶¶¶¶

    ¶¶¶¶¶

    ¶¶¶¶¶

  • Microsoft has released its September 2025 Patch Tuesday updates, addressing a total of 81 security vulnerabilities across its product suite. The security patches cover a wide range of software, including Windows, Microsoft Office, Azure, and SQL Server.

    Among the fixes are 22 Remote Code Execution (RCE) vulnerabilities, making this a significant update for system administrators. Of the 81 flaws, 8 are rated as Critical, with the remaining 73 classified as Important in severity.

    ImpactCount
    Elevation of Privilege (EoP)38
    Remote Code Execution (RCE)22
    Information Disclosure14
    Denial of Service (DoS)4
    Security Feature Bypass2
    Spoofing1
    Total81

    The vulnerabilities cover various categories, with Remote Code Execution (RCE), Elevation of Privilege (EoP), and Information Disclosure being the most frequently addressed types in this month’s release.

    Critical Remote Code Execution Flaws

    This month’s update resolves several critical RCE vulnerabilities that could allow attackers to execute arbitrary code on affected systems. Among the most severe are multiple race condition flaws in the Graphics Kernel (CVE-2025-55226, CVE-2025-55236) and the Windows Graphics Component (CVE-2025-55228), which an authorized attacker could exploit to execute code locally.

    Microsoft Office also received a critical patch for a heap-based buffer overflow vulnerability (CVE-2025-54910) that enables local code execution.

    Additionally, a critical RCE vulnerability in Windows Hyper-V (CVE-2025-55224) was fixed. This flaw, stemming from a race condition, could allow a local attacker to execute arbitrary code. These types of vulnerabilities are particularly dangerous as they can often be exploited to gain initial access or move laterally within a network.

    Widespread Elevation of Privilege and Other Flaws

    A significant portion of the September update is dedicated to fixing Elevation of Privilege vulnerabilities across the Windows ecosystem. A critical EoP flaw in Windows NTLM (CVE-2025-54918) could allow an authorized attacker to elevate their privileges over the network.

    Other important EoP vulnerabilities were patched in PowerShell Direct (CVE-2025-49734), Windows Ancillary Function Driver for WinSock (CVE-2025-54099), and the Windows Kernel (CVE-2025-54110).

    The update also addresses numerous information disclosure vulnerabilities, particularly in the Windows Routing and Remote Access Service (RRAS), with six distinct CVEs (CVE-2025-53797, CVE-2025-53798, CVE-2025-54095, CVE-2025-54096, CVE-2025-54097, CVE-2025-55225) related to buffer over-read and out-of-bounds read issues.

    While not as severe as RCEs, these flaws can leak sensitive memory information that aids attackers in crafting more complex exploits.

    Patches for SharePoint, Azure, and Excel

    Beyond the core operating system, Microsoft has patched critical and important flaws in its enterprise and productivity software.

    A significant RCE vulnerability in Microsoft SharePoint (CVE-2025-54897) was addressed, which could be exploited by an authorized attacker over the network through the deserialization of untrusted data.

    Microsoft Excel received a barrage of fixes for seven different RCE vulnerabilities (CVE-2025-54896, CVE-2025-54898, CVE-2025-54899, CVE-2025-54900, CVE-2025-54902, CVE-2025-54903, CVE-2025-54904).

    These flaws, mostly related to use-after-free and out-of-bounds read issues, allow an attacker to execute code locally if a user opens a specially crafted file.

    Several Elevation of Privilege vulnerabilities were also patched in Azure services, including Azure Arc (CVE-2025-55316) and the Azure Connected Machine Agent (CVE-2025-49692).

    Microsoft urges all customers to apply the September 2025 security updates promptly to protect their systems from potential exploitation. Administrators should prioritize patching the critical RCE and Elevation of Privilege vulnerabilities to mitigate the most severe risks.

    Of the 81 vulnerabilities addressed in Microsoft’s September 2025 Patch Tuesday, none were reported as publicly disclosed or actively exploited. The release includes patches for 8 Critical and 73 Important severity flaws.

    Below is a comprehensive table of all vulnerabilities fixed in this update:

    CVEVulnerability DetailsActively ExploitedTypeSeverity
    Critical Vulnerabilities
    CVE-2025-54918Improper authentication in Windows NTLM allows for network-based privilege elevation.NoElevation of PrivilegeCritical
    CVE-2025-55226A race condition in the Graphics Kernel can be exploited for local code execution.NoRemote Code ExecutionCritical
    CVE-2025-55228A race condition in the Windows Graphics Component allows local code execution.NoRemote Code ExecutionCritical
    CVE-2025-55236A race condition in the Graphics Kernel could lead to local code execution.NoRemote Code ExecutionCritical
    CVE-2025-53799Use of an uninitialized resource in the Windows Imaging Component leads to information disclosure.NoInformation DisclosureCritical
    CVE-2025-53800A flaw in the Microsoft Graphics Component can be used for local privilege elevation.NoElevation of PrivilegeCritical
    CVE-2025-54910A heap-based buffer overflow in Microsoft Office allows for local remote code execution.NoRemote Code ExecutionCritical
    CVE-2025-55224A race condition in Windows Hyper-V can be used for local code execution.NoRemote Code ExecutionCritical
    Important Vulnerabilities
    CVE-2024-21907A flaw in Newtonsoft.Json used by SQL Server can lead to a denial-of-service condition.NoDenial of ServiceImportant
    CVE-2025-49734A flaw in PowerShell Direct allows for local privilege escalation.NoElevation of PrivilegeImportant
    CVE-2025-53797A buffer over-read in RRAS allows for information disclosure over a network.NoInformation DisclosureImportant
    CVE-2025-53798A buffer over-read in RRAS allows for information disclosure over a network.NoInformation DisclosureImportant
    CVE-2025-54095An out-of-bounds read in RRAS allows for network-based information disclosure.NoInformation DisclosureImportant
    CVE-2025-54096An out-of-bounds read in RRAS allows for network-based information disclosure.NoInformation DisclosureImportant
    CVE-2025-54097An out-of-bounds read in RRAS allows for network-based information disclosure.NoInformation DisclosureImportant
    CVE-2025-54099A stack-based buffer overflow in the Ancillary Function Driver for WinSock allows privilege elevation.NoElevation of PrivilegeImportant
    CVE-2025-54101A use-after-free flaw in the Windows SMBv3 Client allows for remote code execution.NoRemote Code ExecutionImportant
    CVE-2025-54102A use-after-free flaw in the Connected Devices Platform Service can be used for privilege elevation.NoElevation of PrivilegeImportant
    CVE-2025-54106An integer overflow in RRAS could allow an attacker to execute code over the network.NoRemote Code ExecutionImportant
    CVE-2025-54110An integer overflow in the Windows Kernel can be used for local privilege elevation.NoElevation of PrivilegeImportant
    CVE-2025-54111A use-after-free flaw in Windows UI XAML allows for local privilege elevation.NoElevation of PrivilegeImportant
    CVE-2025-54894A vulnerability in the Local Security Authority Subsystem Service leads to privilege elevation.NoElevation of PrivilegeImportant
    CVE-2025-54895An integer overflow in SPNEGO NEGOEX allows for local privilege elevation.NoElevation of PrivilegeImportant
    CVE-2025-54896A use-after-free vulnerability in Microsoft Excel allows for local code execution.NoRemote Code ExecutionImportant
    CVE-2025-54897Deserialization of untrusted data in SharePoint can lead to remote code execution.NoRemote Code ExecutionImportant
    CVE-2025-54898An out-of-bounds read in Microsoft Excel can be used for local code execution.NoRemote Code ExecutionImportant
    CVE-2025-54899Freeing memory not on the heap in Microsoft Excel can lead to local code execution.NoRemote Code ExecutionImportant
    CVE-2025-54902An out-of-bounds read in Microsoft Excel allows for local code execution.NoRemote Code ExecutionImportant
    CVE-2025-54903A use-after-free vulnerability in Microsoft Excel allows for local code execution.NoRemote Code ExecutionImportant
    CVE-2025-54904A use-after-free vulnerability in Microsoft Excel allows for local code execution.NoRemote Code ExecutionImportant
    CVE-2025-54905An untrusted pointer dereference in Microsoft Word can lead to information disclosure.NoInformation DisclosureImportant
    CVE-2025-54906Freeing memory not on the heap in Microsoft Office can lead to local code execution.NoRemote Code ExecutionImportant
    CVE-2025-54907A heap-based buffer overflow in Microsoft Visio allows for local code execution.NoRemote Code ExecutionImportant
    CVE-2025-54908A use-after-free vulnerability in Microsoft PowerPoint allows for local code execution.NoRemote Code ExecutionImportant
    CVE-2025-54913A race condition in Windows UI XAML Maps can be used for local privilege elevation.NoElevation of PrivilegeImportant
    CVE-2025-54916A stack-based buffer overflow in Windows NTFS allows for local code execution.NoRemote Code ExecutionImportant
    CVE-2025-54919A race condition in the Windows Graphics Component leads to local code execution.NoRemote Code ExecutionImportant
    CVE-2025-55223A race condition in the DirectX Graphics Kernel allows for local privilege elevation.NoElevation of PrivilegeImportant
    CVE-2025-55225An out-of-bounds read in RRAS allows for network-based information disclosure.NoInformation DisclosureImportant
    CVE-2025-55232Deserialization of untrusted data in HPC Pack can lead to remote code execution.NoRemote Code ExecutionImportant
    CVE-2025-55245Improper link resolution in Xbox Gaming Services can lead to local privilege elevation.NoElevation of PrivilegeImportant
    CVE-2025-55243Exposure of sensitive information in Microsoft OfficePlus can lead to spoofing.NoSpoofingImportant
    CVE-2025-55316External control of a file name or path in Azure Arc allows for privilege elevation.NoElevation of PrivilegeImportant
    CVE-2025-55317Improper link resolution in Microsoft AutoUpdate can be used for local privilege elevation.NoElevation of PrivilegeImportant
    CVE-2025-49692Improper access control in the Azure Connected Machine Agent allows local privilege elevation.NoElevation of PrivilegeImportant
    CVE-2025-47997A race condition in SQL Server can lead to network-based information disclosure.NoInformation DisclosureImportant
    CVE-2025-53796A buffer over-read in RRAS allows for information disclosure over a network.NoInformation DisclosureImportant
    CVE-2025-53801An untrusted pointer dereference in the DWM Core Library can lead to local privilege elevation.NoElevation of PrivilegeImportant
    CVE-2025-53802A use-after-free flaw in the Windows Bluetooth Service can be used for local privilege elevation.NoElevation of PrivilegeImportant
    CVE-2025-53803An error message in the Windows Kernel could disclose sensitive information locally.NoInformation DisclosureImportant
    CVE-2025-53804Exposure of sensitive information in a Windows Kernel-Mode Driver can lead to local information disclosure.NoInformation DisclosureImportant
    CVE-2025-53805An out-of-bounds read in HTTP.sys can lead to a denial of service.NoDenial of ServiceImportant
    CVE-2025-53806A buffer over-read in RRAS allows for information disclosure over a network.NoInformation DisclosureImportant
    CVE-2025-53807A race condition in the Microsoft Graphics Component allows for local privilege elevation.NoElevation of PrivilegeImportant
    CVE-2025-53808A type confusion flaw in the Windows Defender Firewall Service can lead to local privilege elevation.NoElevation of PrivilegeImportant
    CVE-2025-53809Improper input validation in LSASS can lead to a denial of service.NoDenial of ServiceImportant
    CVE-2025-53810A type confusion flaw in the Windows Defender Firewall Service can lead to local privilege elevation.NoElevation of PrivilegeImportant
    CVE-2025-54091An integer overflow in Windows Hyper-V can be used for local privilege elevation.NoElevation of PrivilegeImportant
    CVE-2025-54092A race condition in Windows Hyper-V can be used for local privilege elevation.NoElevation of PrivilegeImportant
    CVE-2025-54093A race condition in the Windows TCP/IP Driver allows for local privilege elevation.NoElevation of PrivilegeImportant
    CVE-2025-54094A type confusion flaw in the Windows Defender Firewall Service can lead to local privilege elevation.NoElevation of PrivilegeImportant
    CVE-2025-54098Improper access control in Windows Hyper-V can be used for local privilege elevation.NoElevation of PrivilegeImportant
    CVE-2025-54103A use-after-free flaw in Windows Management Service can be used for local privilege elevation.NoElevation of PrivilegeImportant
    CVE-2025-54104A type confusion flaw in the Windows Defender Firewall Service can lead to local privilege elevation.NoElevation of PrivilegeImportant
    CVE-2025-54105A race condition in the Brokering File System can be used for local privilege elevation.NoElevation of PrivilegeImportant
    CVE-2025-54107Improper path resolution in MapUrlToZone can lead to a security feature bypass.NoSecurity Feature BypassImportant
    CVE-2025-54108A race condition in the Capability Access Management Service allows for local privilege elevation.NoElevation of PrivilegeImportant
    CVE-2025-54109A type confusion flaw in the Windows Defender Firewall Service can lead to local privilege elevation.NoElevation of PrivilegeImportant
    CVE-2025-54112A use-after-free flaw in Microsoft Virtual Hard Disk can be used for local privilege elevation.NoElevation of PrivilegeImportant
    CVE-2025-54113A heap-based buffer overflow in RRAS allows for remote code execution.NoRemote Code ExecutionImportant
    CVE-2025-54114A race condition in the Connected Devices Platform Service can lead to a denial of service.NoDenial of ServiceImportant
    CVE-2025-54115A race condition in Windows Hyper-V can be used for local privilege elevation.NoElevation of PrivilegeImportant
    CVE-2025-54116Improper access control in Windows MultiPoint Services allows for local privilege elevation.NoElevation of PrivilegeImportant
    CVE-2025-54900A heap-based buffer overflow in Microsoft Excel allows for local code execution.NoRemote Code ExecutionImportant
    CVE-2025-54901A buffer over-read in Microsoft Excel can lead to local information disclosure.NoInformation DisclosureImportant
    CVE-2025-54911A use-after-free flaw in Windows BitLocker can be used for local privilege elevation.NoElevation of PrivilegeImportant
    CVE-2025-54912A use-after-free flaw in Windows BitLocker can be used for local privilege elevation.NoElevation of PrivilegeImportant
    CVE-2025-54915A type confusion flaw in the Windows Defender Firewall Service can lead to local privilege elevation.NoElevation of PrivilegeImportant
    CVE-2025-54917A protection mechanism failure in MapUrlToZone can lead to a security feature bypass.NoSecurity Feature BypassImportant
    CVE-2025-55227A command injection vulnerability in SQL Server allows for network-based privilege elevation.NoElevation of PrivilegeImportant
    CVE-2025-55234A flaw in Windows SMB could allow an attacker to perform relay attacks, leading to privilege elevation.NoElevation of PrivilegeImportant

    It is also essential to ensure the latest servicing stack updates, as detailed in advisory ADV990001, are installed to ensure successful patching.

    Other Patch Tuesday Updates

    Find this Story Interesting! Follow us on Google NewsLinkedIn, and X to Get More Instant Updates.

    The post Microsoft September 2025 Patch Tuesday – 81 Vulnerabilities Fixed Including 22 RCE appeared first on Cyber Security News.

    ¶¶¶¶¶

    ¶¶¶¶¶

    ¶¶¶¶¶

    ¶¶¶¶¶

    ¶¶¶¶¶

  • The U.S. needs a "whole-of-nation approach" to deterring and warding off cyber attacks backed by foreign states, President Donald Trump’s newly confirmed national cyber director said Tuesday. 

    Such attacks will continue until officials impose more severe consequences on bad actors, Sean Cairncross said in his first public address since his confirmation last month to lead the Office of the National Cyber Director. 

    The nation “must send a message this behavior is unacceptable” and will come at a cost, Cairncross said at the Billington Cyber Summit, specifically mentioning China, which has backed campaigns that target telecommunications networks and other critical infrastructure across the country.

    “Engagement and increased involvement with the private sector is necessary for our success," he said. “I’m committed to marshalling a unified, whole-of-nation approach on this, working in lockstep with our allies who share our commitment to democratic values, privacy and liberty…Together, we’ll explore concepts of operation to enable our extremely capable private sector, from exposing malign actions to shifting adversaries’ risk calculus and bolstering resilience."

    During a subsequent appearance at a Tuesday event hosted by Politico, Cairncross said, “I think it is important that we really start to shape adversary behavior” and that “we can’t be ambiguous” when it comes to deterring threat actors.

    The U.S. already conducts clandestine intrusions into adversaries’ networks under legal authorities granted to the National Security Agency, U.S. Cyber Command and others. But lawmakers on both sides of the political aisle have argued the nation hasn’t been assertive enough in its tactics, especially in the wake of the major Chinese hacks.

    Sen. Angus King, I-Maine, also said at Politico’s event that as long as cyberthreat actors “feel that there’s going to be no response, there’s no cost, they’re going to continue to do it.”

    King noted that he sponsored an amendment to the 2026 National Defense Authorization Act with Sen. Tom Cotton, R-Ark., that “charges the Secretary of Defense with developing a deterrent strategy over the next year and a half that will try to remedy this gap in our overall cyber defense.”

    “It doesn’t necessarily have to be cyber for cyber,” he said about countering digital attacks with a more offensive approach. “It can be some other kind of response, but it has to hurt.”

    Trump administration officials and industry partners have also discussed whether privateering contracts, once used to deputize pirate ships, could offer inspiration for authorizing private sector hacking operations against China, Nextgov/FCW reported in May.

    The new ONCD leader also wants to continue efforts to boost the U.S. cybersecurity workforce, a goal that was a focal point for the office during the Biden administration under then-Director Harry Coker. In his first term, Trump signed an executive order focused on the cyber workforce.

    “We need a pipeline that develops and shares talent,” Cairncross said. “It should be pragmatic and accessible, reconciling and taking advantage of existing avenues within academia, vocational schools, corporations and venture capital opportunities to not only educate and train our existing cyber workforce, but to also recruit new talent, preparing the next generation to design and deploy exquisite emerging technologies.”

    Cairncross’s responsibilities include coordinating cybersecurity efforts between various government agencies, developing and implementing national cybersecurity policies and advising the president on critical cyber issues. 

    He also said that ONCD is working to get government systems’ security in order: “We’re working on policies to harden our networks, update our technologies and ensure that we’re prepared for a post-quantum future.”

    ]]>

    ¶¶¶¶¶

    ¶¶¶¶¶

    ¶¶¶¶¶

    ¶¶¶¶¶

    ¶¶¶¶¶

  • Fortinet has disclosed a significant OS command injection vulnerability in its FortiDDoS-F appliances that could allow privileged attackers to execute unauthorized code or commands through the command-line interface (CLI). The security flaw, identified as CVE-2024-45325, affects multiple versions of the FortiDDoS-F product line and carries a CVSS 3.1 score of 6.5, indicating medium severity. Vulnerability Details […]

    The post FortiDDoS Vulnerability Lets Hackers Execute Unauthorized OS Commands appeared first on GBHackers Security | #1 Globally Trusted Cyber Security News Platform.

    ¶¶¶¶¶

    ¶¶¶¶¶

    ¶¶¶¶¶

    ¶¶¶¶¶

    ¶¶¶¶¶

  • Breaking: Israel’s military carried out an attack inside Qatar’s capital city on Tuesday, which is more than 1,000 miles away, including “a precise [air] strike targeting the senior leadership of the Hamas terrorist organization,” the Israeli Defense Forces announced on social media. 

    Targets inside Doha included Khalil al-Hayya, the top negotiator for Hamas, according to Reuters, citing Israeli media. The IDF says those it sought to kill “are directly responsible for the brutal October 7 massacre, and have been orchestrating and managing the war against the State of Israel.” Unnamed sources told Reuters separately that the negotiating team survived the Tuesday strikes in Doha; the claim has not been verified at press time.  

    Bibi: “Today's action against the top terrorist chieftains of Hamas was a wholly independent Israeli operation,” Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu wrote on social media. “Israel initiated it, Israel conducted it, and Israel takes full responsibility,” he added. According to Axios, “The assassination attempt in the Qatari capital comes amid a renewed U.S. effort to reach a Gaza hostage and ceasefire deal between Israel and Hamas.”

    Notable: Israel’s Channel 12 reported U.S. President Donald Trump authorized the Israeli strikes, according to an Israeli official. 

    Qatar’s top diplomat condemned the “cowardly Israeli attack,” which he said struck “residential buildings housing several members of the Political Bureau of Hamas.” 

    Jordan’s top diplomat also condemned “the cowardly Israeli aggression against the sisterly State of Qatar as a flagrant violation of international law,” Foreign Minister Ayman Safadi wrote on social media. 

    Safadi added that he expects more attacks from Israel outside its own borders, warning, “Israel will continue to escalate its aggression, its brutal wars, and its violations of international law, and its threats to regional and international security and peace, unless the international community, particularly the Security Council, takes the necessary steps to deter it and curb its aggression.” His Kuwaiti counterpart expressed similar disdain for the attack on social media Tuesday as well. 

    Israel also attacked at least three targets in Syria on Monday, Charles Lister of the Middle East Institute flagged on social media. Saudi Arabia’s foreign ministry condemned those attacks on social media on Tuesday, describing them as a “flagrant violation of international law and the 1974 Disengagement Agreement between Syria and Israel.” 

    ICYMI: The Israeli military destroyed Syria’s Ministry of Defense in a series of airstrikes in July. MEI’s Lister has a bit more on that situation, here

    New: Israel used leaflets to warn the estimated million or so people still living in Gaza City to evacuate ahead of an upcoming attack by ground forces, the Associated Press reported Tuesday from the Gaza Strip. “Previously, the military has warned specific sections of Gaza City to evacuate ahead of concentrated operations or strikes,” but never the full city until now. 

    However, “many families can’t evacuate even if they want to, because displacement sites are overcrowded and because it can cost more than $1,000 in transportation and other costs to move to southern Gaza, a prohibitive amount for many,” AP reports, citing United Nations officials. 

    Notable: “Hamas' armed wing, the al-Qassam Brigades, on Tuesday claimed responsibility for a shooting that killed six people on the outskirts of Jerusalem” on Monday, Reuters reports

    By the way: Israel’s military has destroyed at least 50 high-rise buildings in Gaza over just the past two days, which Bibi described as “only the beginning of the main intensive operation, the ground incursion of our forces.” 

    Big picture: “We are in an intense war against terrorism on several fronts: in Gaza, in Judea and Samaria, in Lebanon, and in Iran that backs them all,” Netanyahu announced Monday. 

    Panning out: “Israel has been accused of genocide, including this month by the world's biggest group of genocide scholars, over its nearly two-year campaign in the Palestinian enclave that has killed more than 64,000 people according to local authorities,” Reuters adds. 


    Welcome to this Tuesday edition of The D Brief, a newsletter dedicated to developments affecting the future of U.S. national security, brought to you by Ben Watson with Bradley Peniston. It’s more important than ever to stay informed, so thank you for reading. Share your tips and feedback here. And if you’re not already subscribed, you can do that here. On this day in 1948, Soviet army Capt. Kim Il Sung was appointed the first-ever premier of North Korea, which had just been founded with the help of the Soviet military. 

    Caribbean ops

    The U.S. naval presence in the Caribbean is up sixfold, counting not by number of hulls but their total displacement, write CSIS’s Mark Cancian and Chris Park, who use that lens and several others in their new report, “Going to War with the Cartels: The Military Implications.” 

    The effort extends from Trump’s campaign vow to “demolish the foreign drug cartels.” But now, Cancian and Park ask, “With Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth warning that military action ‘won’t stop” with the Sept. 3 attack on a speedboat, “what does a war on cartels mean in military terms?” Read their analysis, here.

    FWIW: “Members of the U.S. Congress have asked for the legal rationale for the deadly strike, noting that the administration has yet to say how it knew who was in the boat or what it was carrying,” Reuters reports. In response, White House officials “had agreed to provide a classified briefing for congressional staff on Friday, but the meeting was abruptly rescheduled for Tuesday.” Read more, here.

    Commentary: “A killing at sea marks America’s descent into lawless power.” Jon Duffy, a retired Navy captain who held command at sea as well as policy positions in the Pentagon, on Capitol Hill, and on the National Security Council, writes that the U.S. “has crossed a dangerous line” with the speedboat strike. “This was not a counterdrug operation. It was not law enforcement. It was killing without process. And it was, to all appearances, against the letter and the spirit of the law.”

    Duffy adds, “This strike is not only about 11 lives lost at sea. It is about the precedent set when the military is unmoored from law, and when silence from senior leaders normalizes the abuse….The oath is clear: unlawful orders—foreign or domestic—must be disobeyed. To stand silent as the military is misused is not restraint. It is betrayal.” Read that, here.

    Related:Republicans in Congress are eager for Trump to expand his use of the military on US soil,” AP reported Monday.

    Around the Defense Department

    Marines press ahead with JLTV purchase after Army quits program. The Marine Corps will keep buying the Humvee-replacing Joint Light Tactical Vehicle, though it may end up with fewer than planned if the Army’s sudden exit drives up the cost per vehicle. Defense One’s Meghann Myers has a bit more, here.

    Anduril and Palantir-backed startup Rivet are officially competing to make the Army’s futuristic wearable gear with virtual displays, Defense One’s Myers reported separately Monday. 

    The $350 million competition is a follow-on project to the Integrated Visual Augmentation System, which was just a headset. This new program—called Soldier Borne Mission Command—includes complementary computers and wearables like watches. In the end, Anduril founder Palmer Luckey told reporters on Monday, there will probably be “dozens” of different headsets under the program, rather than one contractor picked to make one product. 

    For what it’s worth, Luckey has dubbed himself “the world’s best head-mounted display designer,” going back to his creation of the Oculus Rift, an early, commercially-available VR headset. “There's nobody better than me, and I know what I'm doing, and I'm going to make sure that we do it the right way,” he said Monday. Continue reading, here

    New: Space Development Agency Director Derek Tournear is leaving soon to take a job at Auburn University, Breaking Defense reported Monday. 

    Tournear’s been in the post since October 2019, which is long enough to leave with a few accomplishments under his belt, he said in an interview. Those include “proving that Link 16 could be used by satellites to transmit targeting data to weapons platforms in the air, on land and at sea,” and “proving that satellites based in low Earth orbit (LEO) could successfully detect and track missiles.” Continue reading, here

    Related: Need a “Golden Dome” primer? Shera Frankel of the New York Times turned in this explainer Monday (gift link). 

    Additional reading: 

    ]]>

    ¶¶¶¶¶

    ¶¶¶¶¶

    ¶¶¶¶¶

    ¶¶¶¶¶

    ¶¶¶¶¶

  • Salat Stealer has emerged as a pervasive threat targeting Windows endpoints with a focus on harvesting browser-stored credentials and cryptocurrency wallet data.

    First detected in August 2025, this Go-based infostealer leverages a range of evasion tactics, including UPX packing and process masquerading, to slip past conventional defenses.

    Its operators advertise the malware through social engineering campaigns on mainstream platforms, promoting fake software cracks and game cheats that deliver the initial payload.

    Upon execution, Salat Stealer silently injects itself into trusted directories under names like Lightshot.exe and Procmon.exe, blending with legitimate processes to avoid suspicion.

    Cyfirma researchers identified the malware’s multi-layered approach within days of its initial sightings.

    The threat employs both registry run keys and scheduled tasks to maintain persistence, creating entries under names such as RuntimeBroker and Lightshot that execute at logon and repeat every three minutes for an extended period.

    Packed with UPX 4.1.0, the binary’s high entropy value of 7.999 disguises its true behavior until runtime.

    Dynamic analysis revealed that child processes spawn under familiar file paths—C:\Program Files (x86)\Windows NT\Lightshot.exe, for example—making detection by endpoint agents more challenging.

    Cyfirma analysts noted that Salat Stealer’s communication with its command-and-control (C2) infrastructure is both resilient and covert.

    Initial contact uses lightweight UDP packets of approximately 45 bytes sent to IP 104.21.80.1, likely serving as keep-alive beacons.

    In parallel, the stealer establishes an encrypted HTTPS channel to salat.cn/salat, with DNS resolutions pointing to 172.67.194.254 and 104.21.60.88.

    When this primary domain is unreachable, a built-in JavaScript routine fetches a list of fallback domains—‘webrat.in’, ‘webrat.top’, and others—from sniff_domain_list.txt, iterating through each via calls to /alive.php until it locates an active panel for redirection.

    The impact of Salat Stealer extends beyond simple credential theft, as it also targets browser extensions for cryptocurrency wallets such as MetaMask, Trust Wallet, and Phantom.

    Targeting Browser Credentials (Source – Cyfirma)

    By scanning the Chrome extension settings directory, the malware extracts seed phrases and private keys, putting users at risk of irreversible financial loss.

    A similar approach applied to desktop wallet applications—including Electrum, Exodus, and Coinomi—allows the stealer to harvest wallet databases and configuration files.

    All exfiltrated data is temporarily stored in the Temp folder under randomized filenames before transmission to the C2 panel.

    Infection and Persistence Mechanisms

    Salat Stealer’s infection chain begins with a social engineering lure that convinces the victim to execute a malicious archive.

    Upon launch, the executable unpacks itself using UPX and immediately spawns child processes that masquerade as legitimate utilities.

    Command and Control Communication (Source – Cyfirma)

    Persistence is achieved through dual mechanisms: registry run keys and scheduled tasks.

    The following code snippet, part of the “Defender Excluder” script module available in the C2 panel, exemplifies how the malware hardens its foothold:-

    if (Get-Command Add-MpPreference -ErrorAction SilentlyContinue) {
      $ProgramFilesX86 = [System.Environment]::GetFolderPath("ProgramFilesX86")
      Add-MpPreference -ExclusionPath $ProgramFilesX86
      $AppData = [System.Environment]::GetFolderPath("ApplicationData")
      Add-MpPreference -ExclusionPath $AppData
      $LocalAppData = [System.Environment]::GetFolderPath("LocalApplicationData")
      Add-MpPreference -ExclusionPath $LocalAppData
    }

    This script quietly adds critical directories to Windows Defender’s exclusion list, ensuring that neither the main payload nor its auxiliary tools are scanned.

    Persistence Mechanism through Registry Run Keys (Source – Cyfirma)

    Simultaneously, tasked entries named Lightshot and RuntimeBroker are configured to trigger at every logon and at scheduled intervals.

    By combining registry and task scheduler techniques, Salat Stealer sustains long-term access and evasion, demonstrating the growing sophistication of modern MaaS operations.

    Boost your SOC and help your team protect your business with free top-notch threat intelligence: Request TI Lookup Premium Trial.

    The post Salat Stealer Exfiltrates Browser Credentials Via Sophisticated C2 Infrastructure appeared first on Cyber Security News.

    ¶¶¶¶¶

    ¶¶¶¶¶

    ¶¶¶¶¶

    ¶¶¶¶¶

    ¶¶¶¶¶

  • Fortinet has disclosed a medium-severity vulnerability in its FortiDDoS-F product line that could allow a privileged attacker to execute unauthorized commands. Tracked as CVE-2024-45325, the flaw is an OS command injection vulnerability residing within the product’s command-line interface (CLI).

    The vulnerability, identified as CWE-78, stems from an improper neutralization of special elements used in an OS command. An attacker with high privileges and local access to the system could exploit this weakness by sending specially crafted requests to the CLI.

    A successful exploit would allow the attacker to execute arbitrary code or commands with the permissions of the application, potentially leading to a full system compromise.

    The vulnerability has been assigned a CVSSv3 score of 6.5, categorizing it as medium severity.

    The CVSS vector, AV:L/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H, indicates that an attacker requires local access and high-level privileges, and no user interaction is needed.

    Despite the high privilege requirement, the potential impact on confidentiality, integrity, and availability is high. The issue was internally discovered and reported by Théo Leleu of Fortinet’s Product Security team.

    Affected Versions and Mitigation

    Fortinet has confirmed that multiple versions of FortiDDoS-F are affected by this vulnerability. The advisory, FG-IR-24-344, published on September 9, 2025, outlines the specific versions and the recommended actions for administrators.

    VersionAffected RangeSolution
    FortiDDoS-F 7.2Not affectedNot Applicable
    FortiDDoS-F 7.07.0.0 through 7.0.2Upgrade to 7.0.3 or above
    FortiDDoS-F 6.6All versionsMigrate to a fixed release
    FortiDDoS-F 6.5All versionsMigrate to a fixed release
    FortiDDoS-F 6.4All versionsMigrate to a fixed release
    FortiDDoS-F 6.3All versionsMigrate to a fixed release
    FortiDDoS-F 6.2All versionsMigrate to a fixed release
    FortiDDoS-F 6.1All versionsMigrate to a fixed release

    Administrators running vulnerable versions are strongly urged to apply the recommended updates or migrate to a patched release to prevent potential exploitation.

    Organizations using FortiDDoS-F 7.0 should upgrade to version 7.0.3 immediately, while those on older branches (6.1 through 6.6) must plan a migration to a secure version.

    Find this Story Interesting! Follow us on Google NewsLinkedIn, and X to Get More Instant Updates.

    The post FortiDDoS OS Command Injection Vulnerability Let Attackers Execute Unauthorized Commands appeared first on Cyber Security News.

    ¶¶¶¶¶

    ¶¶¶¶¶

    ¶¶¶¶¶

    ¶¶¶¶¶

    ¶¶¶¶¶

  • Ivanti on September 9 released a security advisory detailing six medium and five high severity vulnerabilities impacting Ivanti Connect Secure, Policy Secure, ZTA Gateways, and Neurons for Secure Access. No evidence of customer exploitation has surfaced so far. Patches and fixes are available immediately to address issues ranging from missing authorization checks and cross-site request forgery (CSRF) flaws to […]

    The post Multiple Vulnerabilities Discovered in Ivanti Connect Secure, Policy Secure, and ZTA Gateways appeared first on GBHackers Security | #1 Globally Trusted Cyber Security News Platform.

    ¶¶¶¶¶

    ¶¶¶¶¶

    ¶¶¶¶¶

    ¶¶¶¶¶

    ¶¶¶¶¶

  • A new wave of phishing attacks purporting to originate from South Korea’s National Tax Service has emerged, leveraging familiar electronic document notifications to trick recipients into divulging their Naver credentials.

    Distributed on August 25, 2025, the email mimics the official format used by Naver’s secure document service, displaying the sender as “National Tax Service” and warning that failure to view the “September Tax Return Payment Due Notice” by August 31 will result in alternative delivery methods.

    The message conveys urgency and legitimacy through a plausible subject line and formatting, but subtle anomalies reveal its malicious intent.

    Upon closer inspection of the email header, forensic analysis shows that the message was dispatched from Mail.ru infrastructure rather than an official NTS server.

    The return‐path is schimmel2025@list.ru, and the sender IP 95.163.59.13 corresponds to send174.i.mail.ru. Despite passing SPF, DKIM, and DMARC checks, the email’s ARC chain indicates the first authenticated-received-chain step only, without organizational endorsement.

    Kim Soo-Ki’s National Tax Service phishing email (Source – Wezard4u Tistory)

    Wezard4u Tistory analysts identified that the absence of official NTS domain records in DNS lookups is a clear red flag for cyber defenders and informed users of these inconsistencies.

    Embedded within the body of the email is a link to hxxp://n-info.bill-nts.server-on.net/users2/?m=3Duggcf%3N…&wreply=recipient@naver.com, where the “m” parameter conceals a percent-encoded and ROT13/Base64-mixed URL.

    Decoding reveals a redirection to nid.naver.com, a fabricated login portal designed to harvest credentials.

    The malicious site replicates Naver’s login interface with precise styling, prompting users to enter their username and password under the guise of viewing an official document.

    Phishing email header (Source – Wezard4u Tistory)

    JavaScript injected into the page captures input fields and posts them to a remote server controlled by Kimsuky.

    Detection Evasion Techniques

    Kimsuky’s payload employs multiple evasion tactics to bypass automated filters and human scrutiny.

    By fragmenting the redirect URL across percent-encoding, Base64, and ROT13 layers, the attackers obfuscate the true destination of the link, complicating URL pattern matching by security gateways.

    A simplified Python snippet illustrates the decoding process discovered in the link analysis:-

    import urllib.parse, codecs, base64
    
    raw_param = "uggcf%253N%252S%252Sznvy(.)anire(.)pbz"
    decoded = urllib.parse.unquote(raw_param)
    rot13 = codecs.decode(decoded, "rot_13")
    payload = base64.b64decode(rot13)
    print(payload.decode())

    This routine transforms the encoded string into nid.naver.com, confirming the phishing destination.

    Additionally, the email relies on legitimate Mail.ru TLSv1.3 encryption, ensuring transmission encryption from the sender server to Naver’s mail gateway and further reducing suspicion.

    By combining header forgery, layered URL obfuscation, and realistic UI replication, Kimsuky achieves a high success rate in credential theft campaigns.

    Cybersecurity teams should monitor for Mail.ru–origin traffic masquerading with official domain names and implement decoding routines to flag mixed-encoding URLs.

    Boost your SOC and help your team protect your business with free top-notch threat intelligence: Request TI Lookup Premium Trial.

    The post Beware of Phishing Email from Kimusky Hackers With Subject Spetember Tax Return Due Date Notice appeared first on Cyber Security News.

    ¶¶¶¶¶

    ¶¶¶¶¶

    ¶¶¶¶¶

    ¶¶¶¶¶

    ¶¶¶¶¶