• A new technique allows hackers to extract encrypted authentication tokens from Microsoft Teams on Windows, enabling unauthorized access to chats, emails, and SharePoint files.

    In a blog post dated October 23, 2025, Brahim El Fikhi explains how these tokens, stored in a Chromium-like Cookies database, can be decrypted using Windows’ Data Protection API (DPAPI).

    This method bypasses recent security hardening, posing risks for lateral movement and data exfiltration in enterprise environments.​

    These access tokens grant impersonation capabilities, such as sending Teams messages or emails on behalf of victims, which attackers can exploit for social engineering or persistence.

    El Fikhi’s focus on desktop Office apps, especially Teams, highlights vulnerabilities in embedded browser components that handle authentication via login.microsoftonline.com. Microsoft’s ecosystem remains a prime target, with recent disruptions noted in threats against Teams as of early October 2025.​

    Early Microsoft Teams versions stored auth cookies in plaintext within the SQLite file at %AppData%\Local\Microsoft\Teams\Cookies, a flaw exposed by Vectra AI in 2022 that allowed simple file reads to harvest tokens for Graph API abuse, bypassing MFA.

    Updates eliminated this plaintext storage, adopting encrypted formats aligned with Chromium’s cookie protection to prevent disk-based theft.​

    However, the shift introduces new attack vectors. Tokens now use AES-256-GCM encryption protected by DPAPI, a Windows API that ties keys to user or machine contexts for data isolation.

    This relies on the user’s login credentials, making decryption feasible with local access but challenging remotely without privilege escalation. Similar protections in browsers like Chrome have been cracked via key extraction, a pattern echoed in Teams’ msedgewebview2.exe process.​

    Microsoft Teams Access Tokens Exfiltrated

    To pinpoint token locations, researchers employed ProcMon from SysInternals, filtering for WriteFile operations on msedgewebview2.exe the embedded Edge WebView2 browser spawned by ms-teams.exe during login.

    This process writes to the Cookies database, unlike the main executable, which avoids sensitive file I/O beyond logs.​

    The SQLite Cookies table holds critical entries: host_key (e.g., teams.microsoft.com), name (cookie identifier), and encrypted_value prefixed with “v10” (0x76 0x31 0x30), indicating Chromium’s version 10 encryption.

    The schema parses as: 3-byte tag, 12-byte nonce (initialization vector), and the AES-encrypted payload. The master key is in %AppData%\Local\Packages\MSTeams_8wekyb3d8bbwe\LocalCache\Microsoft\MSTeams\EBWebView\Local State, a JSON file under os_crypt.encrypted_key—a Base64 string starting with “DPAPI” after decoding, protected by user-specific DPAPI blobs in %AppData%\Microsoft\Protect.​

    Extract and DPAPI-unprotect the key using Windows APIs like CryptUnprotectData, which requires the attacker’s context to match the user’s (e.g., via mimikatz for credential dumping).

    Then, apply AES-256-GCM with the key and nonce to the payload, yielding the auth token. El Fikhi’s Rust PoC automates this, dumping tokens post-teams.exe termination to unlock the file, a standard limitation, as the process holds an exclusive lock. Python equivalents, like those for Chrome, demonstrate similar logic:​

    This code, adapted from browser forensics, directly applies to Teams. A GitHub PoC (teams_dump) lists and decrypts the database, outputting JSON with hosts like teams.microsoft.com and cookies like MUIDB or TSREGIONCOOKIE.​

    Mitigations

    Tools like GraphSpy ingest the token for scoped abuse reading SharePoint or emails, limited to Teams permissions (e.g., Chat.ReadWrite, Mail.Send). Microsoft’s Primary Refresh Token (PRT) ties into this, enabling seamless SSO but amplifying token reuse risks across apps.​

    Mitigations include monitoring for ms-teams.exe kills or unusual ProcMon patterns, enforcing app-bound encryption, and preferring web-based Teams to avoid local storage.

    Rotate tokens via Entra ID policies and audit API logs for anomalies. As Teams threats evolve, DPAPI-aware EDR rules are essential.​

    Follow us on Google News, LinkedIn, and X for daily cybersecurity updates. Contact us to feature your stories.

    The post Hackers Can Access Microsoft Teams Chat and Emails by Retrieving Access Tokens appeared first on Cyber Security News.

    ¶¶¶¶¶

    ¶¶¶¶¶

    ¶¶¶¶¶

    ¶¶¶¶¶

    ¶¶¶¶¶

  • A sophisticated information-stealing malware known as Vidar Stealer has undergone a complete architectural transformation with the release of version 2.0, introducing advanced capabilities that enable it to bypass Chrome’s latest security protections through direct memory injection techniques.

    Released on October 6, 2025, by its developer “Loadbaks” on underground forums, this new iteration features a complete rewrite from C++ to pure C, implementing a multithreaded architecture that significantly enhances its data exfiltration speed and evasion capabilities.

    The timing of Vidar 2.0’s emergence coincides with a notable decline in Lumma Stealer activity, positioning Vidar as a potential successor in the information stealer ecosystem.

    Priced at $300 for lifetime access, the malware offers cybercriminals a cost-effective yet powerful toolset capable of systematically targeting credentials from browsers, cryptocurrency wallets, cloud services, gaming platforms, and communication applications including Discord and Telegram.

    The malware’s enhanced anti-analysis measures and sophisticated credential extraction methods represent a concerning evolution in the information stealer threat landscape.

    Vidar developer announcing the release of version 2.0 (Source – Trend Micro)

    Vidar originally emerged in 2018 on Russian-language underground forums, initially leveraging the Arkei stealer source code.

    Over the years, it has distinguished itself from competitors like Raccoon and RedLine through consistent updates supporting new browsers, wallets, and two-factor authentication applications.

    Trend Micro analysts identified that the latest version introduces four significant architectural changes: a complete C language rewrite for enhanced stability and speed, a multithreaded system that dynamically scales based on victim computer specifications, advanced browser credential extraction capabilities, and an automatic polymorphic builder that generates unique binary signatures for each build.

    The multithreaded architecture represents one of Vidar 2.0’s most significant enhancements, allowing the malware to perform data collection tasks across multiple parallel threads.

    This system automatically adjusts performance by creating more worker threads on powerful systems and fewer threads on weaker machines, ensuring optimal operation without overwhelming the target.

    The parallel processing significantly reduces the time the malware needs to remain active on compromised systems, making detection and intervention by security software substantially more challenging.

    Chrome AppBound Encryption Bypass Through Memory Injection

    Vidar 2.0’s most notable technical achievement involves its capability to bypass Chrome’s AppBound encryption protections through sophisticated memory injection techniques.

    According to the developer, the malware has “implemented unique appBound methods that aren’t found in the public domain,” specifically targeting Chrome’s enhanced security measures designed to prevent unauthorized credential extraction by binding encryption keys to specific applications.

    This represents a direct challenge to Chrome’s latest security enhancements aimed at protecting user credentials from information stealers.

    The malware employs a tiered approach to browser credential extraction, initially attempting traditional methods such as systematic enumeration of browser profiles and extraction of encryption keys from Local State files using standard DPAPI decryption.

    When these conventional techniques fail against Chrome’s AppBound encryption, Vidar 2.0 escalates to an advanced technique that launches target browsers with debugging enabled and injects malicious code directly into running browser processes using either shellcode or reflective DLL injection.

    Vidar 2.0’s execution flow (Source – Trend Micro)

    The injected payload operates entirely within browser memory, extracting encryption keys directly from the active process address space rather than attempting to decrypt them from storage.

    This memory-based approach effectively circumvents Chrome’s AppBound encryption because it steals keys that are already decrypted and in use by the legitimate browser process.

    The stolen encryption keys are then communicated back to the main malware process via named pipes, a technique that avoids creating disk artifacts that could be detected by forensic analysis or security software.

    This dual-pronged extraction strategy targeting both traditional browser storage methods and Chrome’s latest protections across multiple browser platforms including Chrome, Firefox, Edge, and other Chromium-based browsers demonstrates the malware’s comprehensive approach to credential theft.

    Follow us on Google NewsLinkedIn, and X to Get More Instant UpdatesSet CSN as a Preferred Source in Google.

    The post Vidar Stealer Bypassing Browser Security Via Direct Memory Injection to Steal Login Credentials appeared first on Cyber Security News.

    ¶¶¶¶¶

    ¶¶¶¶¶

    ¶¶¶¶¶

    ¶¶¶¶¶

    ¶¶¶¶¶

  • The stealer malware ecosystem has evolved into a sophisticated criminal enterprise capable of processing hundreds of millions of credentials daily.

    Over the past several years, threat actors have transformed the landscape of credential theft through specialized malware families and underground distribution platforms.

    These information-stealing operations now represent one of the most significant threats to digital security, with criminal networks establishing complex hierarchies to manage the harvest and distribution of stolen authentication data.

    Recent investigations into the stealer log ecosystem have revealed an alarming scale of operations. A single Telegram account monitored by security researchers was observed ingesting as many as 50 million credentials within a 24-hour period.

    The infrastructure supporting these operations has grown increasingly sophisticated, with threat actors utilizing messaging platforms, particularly Telegram, as their primary distribution channel.

    These platforms serve as marketplaces where stolen data is bought, sold, and freely shared among criminal communities.

    The criminal ecosystem operates through a tiered structure consisting of three primary groups. Primary sellers manage key operations and maintain both public channels where stealer logs are shared and paid private channels offering premium access to clients.

    Early prototype of the initial project (Source – Synthient)

    Aggregators collect stealer logs from multiple sources and redistribute them through their channels, often providing search capabilities for victims across specific sites.

    Traffers work in cooperation with primary sellers to spread malware, occasionally operating their own channels to demonstrate their effectiveness.

    Synthient analysts identified this hierarchical structure while monitoring the platforms and building systems to ingest shared data in hopes of helping victims.

    The motivations driving these operations vary across groups. While primary sellers focus on monetizing stolen credentials through subscription models, aggregators often leak data publicly to gain attention and reputation within criminal communities.

    This creates a complex web where the same stolen credentials may appear across multiple channels in various formats.

    Some channels advertise access to billions of credential lines, with pricing models ranging from weekly subscriptions at 60 dollars to lifetime access for 600 dollars, demonstrating the commercialization of cybercrime.

    The volume of credentials flowing through these channels has reached staggering proportions. Analysis of one major operation revealed that over the course of monitoring, researchers indexed approximately 30 billion Telegram messages and parsed 80 billion credentials.

    During peak activity periods, the system processed 600 million credentials in a single day and indexed 1.2 billion messages within the same timeframe.

    Technical Infrastructure and Data Formats

    The technical implementation of stealer log distribution presents unique challenges for both criminals and researchers.

    Threat actors employ multiple credential formats depending on the malware family and distribution method. The most common formats include simple combolist structures using delimiters such as colons, semicolons, or pipes to separate email addresses and passwords.

    More sophisticated formats follow URL-Login-Password conventions, while stealer logs from actual malware infections contain structured data with labeled fields.

    # ComboList
    email: password
    email; password
    email|password
    
    # ULP
    url:login:password
    url|login|password
    
    # Stealer
    URL:
    Login:
    Password:

    The inconsistency in data formats creates operational challenges for aggregators attempting to consolidate stolen credentials.

    Synthient researchers noted that aggregators often merge multiple files from different resellers, creating what they described as “pseudo-unique abominations” that combine various credential formats.

    This complexity is further compounded when primary sellers password-protect their archives with links to their channels, preventing aggregators from easily claiming credit for the data.

    The technical hurdles require sophisticated parsing systems capable of identifying and processing credentials regardless of their original format or packaging method.

    Follow us on Google NewsLinkedIn, and X to Get More Instant UpdatesSet CSN as a Preferred Source in Google.

    The post Threat Actors With Stealer Malwares Processing Millions of Credentials a Day appeared first on Cyber Security News.

    ¶¶¶¶¶

    ¶¶¶¶¶

    ¶¶¶¶¶

    ¶¶¶¶¶

    ¶¶¶¶¶

  • A coalition of industry groups and former officials is asking Congress to preserve measures in the annual intelligence-community authorization bill that support the use of open-source intelligence by U.S. spy agencies, according to letters first seen by Nextgov/FCW.

    The missives are undersigned by firms such as Babel Street and ANDECO, which sell risk and threat intelligence services derived from commercially or publicly available information that’s not necessarily gathered through more covert means available to spy agencies. Graphika, which performs social media network analysis to identify disinformation campaigns, is also a signatory.

    The measures, housed in Title 6 of the House Intelligence Committee’s version of the fiscal year 2026 Intelligence Authorization Act, are also supported by the OSINT Foundation, a professional association of open-source practitioners in the U.S. intelligence community. Former officials are also signatories, including Kristin Wood, who served as a deputy director in the CIA’s Open Source Center. 

    Open-source intelligence—OSINT for short—is the collection and analysis of publicly available data such as social media posts, news reports or satellite imagery.

    The Title 6 measures aim to further legitimize the use of OSINT in day-to-day intelligence work; among other steps, they would require spy agencies to appoint senior officials responsible for managing and coordinating their OSINT activities.

    “The arrival of mission-relevant artificial intelligence (AI) systems within the past two years means the [U.S. intelligence community] is, for the first time, able to make use of large unclassified datasets at scale to deliver decision advantage to U.S. policymakers and warfighters,” one of the letters says.

    The House intelligence panel has zeroed in on OSINT this year, forming an open-source subcommittee. Last year, the Office of the Director of National Intelligence, under then-director Avril Haines, released an OSINT strategy that called for using artificial intelligence and machine learning.

    The missives are addressed to the Republican and Democratic leaders on the congressional intelligence panels. The sweeping intel bill is considered annually to authorize funding, programs and oversight of the U.S. spy community. 

    The letters come as the Senate and House are negotiating compromises over differences in the houses' legislation. The Senate’s version does not have the same OSINT provisions as the lower chamber's.

    The letters aim to motivate both chambers to keep the House measures, though not all elements of the U.S. intelligence enterprise are on board. The National Geospatial-Intelligence Agency, which uses satellites and imagery analysis to track targets from space, is looking for a carve-out, according to Brandon McKee, the senior director for government affairs at the Special Competitive Studies Project’s Action Program, which backs the OSINT language.

    A second person familiar with the matter, who requested anonymity because they were not authorized to speak publicly, also confirmed that NGA is not backing the measures at this time.

    “They were not an entity that I believed would have been against a provision like this,” McKee said in an interview with Nextgov/FCW. “This is something that would greatly benefit the agency.” 

    He argued that open-source intelligence can produce high-quality analysis for U.S. decisionmakers, often rivaling or complementing classified intelligence, while being faster to deliver and more affordable than other means.

    “If you’re looking to provide the best intelligence to policymakers and decisionmakers…this is another area that has to be there," he said.

    There may be broader opposition. A Senate aide, who requested anonymity to speak candidly, said the Defense Department writ large is also opposed, as well as some other IC components. The aide did not name those agencies. The DOD houses NGA, as well as other intelligence giants such as the National Security Agency and National Reconnaissance Office.

    It’s not entirely clear why these spy agencies aren’t on board, though the hesitancy could stem from institutional concerns about losing control over their traditional mission space, budgets, or legal authorities.

    Nextgov/FCW has asked ODNI for comment.

    “In the digital age, OSINT plays a critical role in real-time analysis, strategic warning and supporting tactical operations. We are proud that the HPSCI FY26 IAA, with the inclusion of the first-ever OSINT title, passed out of Committee overwhelmingly on a bipartisan basis,” a House Intelligence Committee spokesperson said. “Furthermore, we appreciate the letters of support from the nonprofit organizations and their recognition that the IC can more effectively and efficiently use open-source data.”

    Spy agencies aren’t new to the use of OSINT, and many are predominant users of open-source means. Still, the acquisition and use of such data has been deemed controversial in the past.

    Personal information on digital marketplaces like social media platforms is frequently packaged by data brokers, and spy agencies are among their customers. The dynamic has put the intelligence community on thin ice with some lawmakers and privacy advocates who call it an end-run around the Fourth Amendment, which bars unreasonable searches and seizures.

    Last year, the Office of the Director of National Intelligence issued new policies that aim to guide spy agencies on best practices for ethically using commercial data. But agencies were not mandated to obtain a warrant before procuring or searching through datasets, a requirement that civil liberties groups have long advocated for.

    OSINT has played a major role in recent armed conflicts, especially those in Gaza and Ukraine. Some groups argue that while open-source analysis has helped expose atrocities and verify battlefield developments, it also risks crossing ethical lines like revealing civilian locations, spreading unvetted or unverified data and operating in legal gray zones that aren’t immediately addressable under current humanitarian law.

    ]]>

    ¶¶¶¶¶

    ¶¶¶¶¶

    ¶¶¶¶¶

    ¶¶¶¶¶

    ¶¶¶¶¶

  • A sophisticated new threat has emerged in the cybersecurity landscape, leveraging the popular communication platform Discord to conduct covert operations.

    ChaosBot, a Rust-based malware strain, represents an evolution in adversarial tactics by hiding malicious command and control traffic within legitimate cloud service communications.

    This approach allows attackers to blend seamlessly into normal network traffic, making detection significantly more challenging for traditional security solutions.

    The malware operates through a carefully orchestrated infection chain that begins with either compromised VPN credentials or phishing campaigns using malicious Windows shortcut files.

    Once executed, ChaosBot establishes persistent access by validating its Discord bot token and creating a dedicated private channel named after the victim’s computer.

    This channel becomes an interactive command shell where attackers issue commands such as shell, download, and scr (screenshot), with results exfiltrated back as attached files through Discord’s API.

    Picussecurity researchers identified the malware’s sophisticated evasion capabilities, which include patching the Windows Event Tracing (ETW) function to blind endpoint detection systems and performing anti-virtualization checks against known MAC address prefixes for VMware and VirtualBox environments.

    These techniques demonstrate a deliberate effort to evade analysis in sandboxed security research environments.

    Discord-Based Command and Control Infrastructure

    ChaosBot’s technical implementation reveals a well-engineered C2 protocol built entirely on Discord’s API infrastructure.

    Written in Rust and utilizing the reqwest or serenity library, the malware maintains communication through standard HTTPS requests that appear identical to legitimate Discord traffic.

    Upon initial execution, ChaosBot validates its embedded bot token with a GET request to hxxps://discord[.]com/api/v10/users/@me.

    Following successful authentication, it creates a victim-specific channel using a POST request:-

    POST hxxps://discord[.]com/api/v10/guilds/<THREAT_ACTOR_GUILD_ID>/channels 
    {"name":"<VICTIM_COMPUTER_NAME>","type":0}

    Command execution relies on a continuous polling mechanism that checks for new messages in the victim’s channel.

    When operators issue shell commands, ChaosBot forces UTF8 encoding through PowerShell: powershell -Command "$OutputEncoding = [System.Text.Encoding]::UTF8; <SOME_COMMAND>".

    The command output, screenshots, or downloaded files are then uploaded back to Discord as multipart/form-data attachments, creating a fully functional remote access capability through a platform trusted by most corporate firewalls and security appliances.

    Follow us on Google NewsLinkedIn, and X to Get More Instant UpdatesSet CSN as a Preferred Source in Google.

    The post New Rust-Based ChaosBot Malware Leverages Discord for Stealthy Command and Control appeared first on Cyber Security News.

    ¶¶¶¶¶

    ¶¶¶¶¶

    ¶¶¶¶¶

    ¶¶¶¶¶

    ¶¶¶¶¶

  • “Defending the homeland” has always been the point of the national defense strategy, experts argue, but the precursors to the forthcoming update hint that the way the U.S. practices homeland defense could be changing. 

    While deterring China—the top priority listed in the most recent strategies—is seen as part of the larger project of protecting the homeland, current defense planning guidance is more specific about operations on American soil playing a bigger role. 

    “We're already seeing that they view homeland defense in this administration as including border security, counter-drug operations, even domestic law enforcement, right?” Todd Harrison, a senior fellow at the American Enterprise Institute, said Thursday at a Center for a New American Security event. “And so if they are changing the definition of what is included in homeland defense—then, yeah, I think those are very different capability sets, things that the military is not used to doing, it's not necessarily that good at doing, or appropriate or legal to do in some cases.”

    The question is how the budget will reflect that shift in priorities. A CNAS report released Tuesday found that recent years’ defense spending has prioritized innovation over actual deterrence of adversaries, leaving a hole in near-term readiness.

    “So what we found is that there is a gap between what's available now and what's required now to maintain deterrence in the near- and medium-term, and the emphasis that's being placed on those long-term objectives,” said Carlton Haelig, a CNAS fellow who co-authored the report.

    To reverse that trend, the Pentagon can shift spending to less-expensive, quick-turn acquisitions, and away from exquisite systems that take decades to develop and won’t be ready in time to make a difference on the next battlefield.

    The current administration has made some headway on paper, changing policies to allow stockpiling of attritable drones while also standing up a task force to tackle the counter-drone threat.

    But with a shrinking defense budget, the Pentagon is on shaky ground to continue making investments in deterrence while also increasing operations stateside, which it professes to prioritize.

    “There's been a lot of reporting about the potential to elevate the homeland,” Philip Sheers, a CNAS research associate and the report’s co-author. “It's not necessarily a foregone conclusion at all that China cedes priority in that formulation, but there's rumbling that there will be a different formulation altogether of the strategic priorities of the department in the next strategy.”

    While this year’s reconciliation bill brought a one-time infusion of cash, hiking defense spending up to nearly $1 trillion, Harrison argued that this kind of budget trick isn’t sustainable. 

    “After the midterm elections, all bets are off,” he said, if party control changes in one or both hours of Congress. “If they want to actually keep advancing these, all of the different systems and programs within Golden Dome, it's got to be in the base budget. And if they're trying to keep the base budget flat at current levels, including that Golden Dome funding would require really catastrophic cuts.”

    But even with all that in mind, he said, it might be naive to look to the NDS as a guide for how the Defense Department spends money.

    “At the end of the day, the National Defense Strategy is a piece of paper, and it's not worth anything unless the administration actually intends to follow it, to use it as a guiding framework,” Harrison said. “I'm not sure that there is any strategy document that will actually frame or constrain or guide what the president chooses to do on a day-to-day basis, so I don't know that it'll end up being that important.”

    In his opinion, he added, the Office of Management and Budget has been driving the Pentagon’s current budget request more than the Defense Department itself. 

    “And I don't think OMB is going to feel constrained at all, or guided at all, by this piece of paper that Bridge Colby is going to produce,” he said.

    ]]>

    ¶¶¶¶¶

    ¶¶¶¶¶

    ¶¶¶¶¶

    ¶¶¶¶¶

    ¶¶¶¶¶

  • Salt Typhoon, a China-linked advanced persistent threat (APT) group active since 2019, has emerged as one of the most sophisticated cyber espionage operations targeting global critical infrastructure.

    Also tracked as Earth Estries, GhostEmperor, and UNC2286, the group has conducted high-impact campaigns against telecommunications providers, energy networks, and government systems across more than 80 countries.

    The threat actor leverages zero-day exploits in edge devices including Ivanti, Fortinet, and Cisco appliances to establish initial access, while employing DLL sideloading techniques to maintain stealth and evade traditional signature-based detection mechanisms.

    Recent intrusions demonstrate an alarming capability to compromise lawful intercept systems and exfiltrate metadata affecting millions of users.

    The group’s operations blend intelligence collection with geopolitical influence, exposing the strategic nature of state-sponsored cyber campaigns.

    DarkTrace analysts identified early-stage intrusion activity in a European telecommunications organization during July 2025, observing tactics consistent with Salt Typhoon’s known procedures.

    The intrusion began with exploitation of a Citrix NetScaler Gateway appliance, allowing the threat actor to pivot to Citrix Virtual Delivery Agent hosts within the organization’s Machine Creation Services subnet.

    Initial access originated from infrastructure potentially associated with the SoftEther VPN service, demonstrating infrastructure obfuscation from the outset.

    DLL Sideloading and Persistence Mechanisms

    The technical sophistication of Salt Typhoon’s operations becomes evident through their systematic abuse of legitimate software for malicious purposes.

    DarkTrace researchers observed the delivery of SNAPPYBEE backdoor, also known as Deed RAT, to multiple internal endpoints as DLL files accompanied by legitimate executable files from trusted antivirus solutions.

    The threat actor specifically targeted Norton Antivirus, Bkav Antivirus, and IObit Malware Fighter executables to facilitate DLL side-loading operations.

    This technique enabled the group to execute malicious payloads under the guise of trusted security software, effectively bypassing traditional security controls.

    The backdoor established command-and-control communications through LightNode VPS endpoints, utilizing both HTTP and an unidentified TCP-based protocol.

    HTTP communications featured POST requests with distinctive URI patterns such as “/17ABE7F017ABE7F0”, connecting to the domain aar.gandhibludtric[.]com (38.54.63[.]75), recently linked to Salt Typhoon infrastructure.

    Follow us on Google NewsLinkedIn, and X to Get More Instant UpdatesSet CSN as a Preferred Source in Google.

    The post Salt Typhoon Using Zero-Day Exploits and DLL Sideloading Techniques to Attack Organizations appeared first on Cyber Security News.

    ¶¶¶¶¶

    ¶¶¶¶¶

    ¶¶¶¶¶

    ¶¶¶¶¶

    ¶¶¶¶¶

  • A trio of nominees to replace inspectors general fired by President Donald Trump were pressed by Senate Democrats on Thursday about their propensity to act independently of the White House.

    Sen. Gary Peters, D-Mich., the ranking member of the Senate Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs Committee, started the hearing by asking the three nominees whether Trump violated the law when he fired 17 IGs at the beginning of his second term without providing advance notice or “substantive rationale” to Congress. 

    The trio, who would replace fired watchdogs at the departments of Defense and Labor as well as the Small Business Administration, generally declined to answer Peters’ question, saying the matter is currently being litigated. 

    Peters told the nominees, “It's clear that you folks don't understand the role of an IG and that basically disqualifies you.”

    A federal judge in September ruled that it was “obvious” the president broke federal law with respect to the removals, but she rejected a request by some of them to be reinstated after determining they could not show they suffered irreparable harm. Panel Democrats, in particular, criticized Labor IG nom Anthony D’Esposito, a former U.S. representative from New York. Last year, the New York Times reported that he may have violated House ethics rules by apparently hiring his fiancee’s daughter as well as a woman with whom he was alleged to have had an affair. 

    D’Esposito answered a question from Sen. Richard Blumenthal, D-Conn., about whether he would be a political candidate in the next election by saying, “As of today, my focus is to be confirmed as inspector general of the U.S. Labor Department. Having discussions about the future are questions that I can't answer.” 

    Blumenthal also pointed out that D’Esposito’s campaign website is still up, but the nominee said that he doesn’t use it. 

    “The campaign website that is still active is not being updated. It's not being used. There is no fundraising being done,” D’Esposito said. “There's not an active campaign.”

    On Oct. 9, the Senate Health, Education, Labor and Pensions Committee advanced D’Esposito’s nomination in a party-line 12-11 vote. Still, Sen. Lisa Murkowski, R-Alaska, said during that markup that she has concerns about his political history influencing his ability to be impartial in the position. 

    “I'm going to be looking to make sure that he executes his new responsibilities with the unbiased nature that he has committed to me,” Murkowski said. 

    The panel on Thursday also considered the nominations of Platte Moring to be DOD IG and William Kirk to lead the SBA IG office. 

    The Senate Armed Services Committee advanced Moring’s nomination on Oct. 9. Staff for the panel didn’t immediately respond to a question about how senators voted on the nominee.  

    Sen. Jack Reed, D-R.I., the ranking member of SASC, said during that committee’s confirmation hearing for Moring that his nomination was a “very wise choice.” Moring is a retired lieutenant colonel and served as deputy general counsel at DOD during Trump’s first term. 

    On Thursday, Moring promised to notify Congress if he believes an IG investigation is being improperly interfered with. 

    The DOD IG is currently evaluating Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth at the request of Reed and SASC Chairman Roger Wicker, R-Miss., over his use of Signal to inadvertently share information about military operations in Yemen with a journalist.

    Kirk’s nomination was advanced by the Senate Small Business and Entrepreneurship Committee on Oct. 8 in a 10-9 vote. According to his LinkedIn, he is the acting chief of staff in the Education Department’s general counsel office and has held multiple positions in the EPA OIG. 

    While the three IG nominees have already been approved by a Senate committee, HSGAC still held a hearing with them because the panel shares jurisdiction for almost all IGs. A committee aide told Government Executive that, while HSGAC can hold a separate vote on them, the nominees are automatically sent to the floor 20 days after being favorably reported by their primary committee. 

    Trump’s nominee to lead the Office of Special Counsel, Paul Ingrassia, was scheduled to be a part of Thursday’s hearing, but the White House on Tuesday pulled his nomination after Senate Republicans expressed concerns about reports that he has been accused of sexual harassment and sent racist text messages. 

    The president last week fired another IG — Parisa Salehi at the Export-Import Bank — without notifying Congress. While he did not provide a justification, an Office of Management and Budget spokesperson has previously said in a statement to Government Executive that IGs “have become corrupt, partisan and in some cases, have lied to the public.”

    ]]>

    ¶¶¶¶¶

    ¶¶¶¶¶

    ¶¶¶¶¶

    ¶¶¶¶¶

    ¶¶¶¶¶

  • In a move to tighten defenses against credential theft, Microsoft has rolled out a significant change to Windows File Explorer starting with security updates released on and after October 14, 2025.

    The update automatically disables the preview pane for files downloaded from the internet, aiming to block a sneaky vulnerability that could expose users’ NTLM hashes sensitive credentials used for network authentication.

    This adjustment addresses a long-standing risk where malicious files, especially those embedding HTML elements like <link> or <src> tags pointing to external resources, could trigger unauthorized network requests during previews.

    Attackers have exploited this in the past to harvest hashes, potentially leading to lateral movement in networks or full account takeovers.

    By defaulting to a more cautious approach, Microsoft is prioritizing proactive security without requiring user intervention, a welcome step amid rising phishing and malware campaigns targeting Windows users.

    File Previews Turned Off

    The new behavior hinges on the “Mark of the Web” (MotW) attribute, which Windows applies to files from untrusted sources like the Internet or Internet Zone file shares.

    Once tagged, these files will not show previews in File Explorer. Instead, users will see a clear warning message: “The file you are attempting to preview could harm your computer. If you trust the file and the source from which you received it, you may open it to view its contents.”

    For everyday users, this means a minor workflow hiccup: previews are off for potentially risky files, but everything else, like local documents or trusted shares, remains unchanged. No extra setup is needed; the protection kicks in automatically post-update.

    IT admins and power users will appreciate that it applies broadly to downloaded files and remote shares, reducing the attack surface in enterprise environments where NTLMv2 weaknesses persist despite pushes toward modern auth like Kerberos.

    This isn’t a full lockdown, it’s a smart nudge toward safer habits. Previews still work for vetted files, and the change encourages verifying sources before diving in.

    If you’re dealing with a trusted download, overriding is straightforward but deliberate. Right-click the file in File Explorer, hit Properties, and check the “Unblock” box. Note that changes might not apply until your next login.

    For entire file shares in Internet Zones, head to Internet Options in the Control Panel, navigate to the Security tab, and add the share’s address to the Local Intranet or Trusted Sites zone. Be cautious: this lowers defenses for all files from that source, so reserve it for verified networks.

    Microsoft’s FAQ emphasizes trusting files only from known origins, underscoring that this tweak is about mitigation, not elimination of risks. As cyber threats evolve, such incremental updates help keep Windows resilient without overcomplicating daily use.

    Follow us on Google News, LinkedIn, and X for daily cybersecurity updates. Contact us to feature your stories.

    The post Microsoft Enhances Windows Security by Turning Off File Previews for Downloads appeared first on Cyber Security News.

    ¶¶¶¶¶

    ¶¶¶¶¶

    ¶¶¶¶¶

    ¶¶¶¶¶

    ¶¶¶¶¶

  • Eight months after Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth fired the Air Force’s top lawyer, the judge advocate general tasked with those duties has stepped down. No one has yet been nominated to permanently fill either of the service’s top legal jobs.

    Maj. Gen. Rebecca Vernon, who had served as deputy Air Force JAG since 2022, became acting JAG after Hegseth’s Feb. 21 announcement that he was firing Lt. Gen. Charles Plummer. Vernon’s last day on the job was Sunday and her retirement date is set for January 1, 2026, Air Force spokesperson Ann Stefanek said.

    Vernon, who joined the Air Force in 1996, has received several awards and decorations for her service and legal expertise, including the 2019 Air Force Association’s award for outstanding senior judge attorney, according to her service biography

    Reached by phone, Vernon declined to comment on her departure. 

    For now, at least, the role of acting Air Force JAG will be handled by Maj. Gen. Mitchel Neurock, who had served as Vernon’s and Plummer’s mobilization assistant. Neurock was appointed by Air Force Secretary Troy Meink, Stefanek said in an emailed statement. 

    The judge advocate general of each military service—TJAG for short—must be confirmed by the U.S. Senate. A former Air Force lawyer said the lack of a Senate-confirmed TJAG leaves the branch’s legal officers in limbo.

    “It’s tough to make any long-term plans without that position filled,” the lawyer said. “We’re in the middle of assignment season and the TJAG makes those decisions. There’s a ripple effect throughout the [JAG] Corps that hurts morale, retention, budgets, hiring, and every major policy decision.”

    The services are missing more than their top JAGs: the Pentagon has also been sending lower-level lawyers to the Justice Department to serve as temporary immigration judges. 

    This has raised concerns among legal experts. Margy O’Herron, a senior fellow in the Brennan Center’s Liberty and National Security Program, wrote in September that the administration’s plan will pull JAGs “away from the important work they are trained and assigned to do, risking military readiness.”

    Earlier this year, Hegseth said he fired the Air Force and Army TJAGs because they were "roadblocks to orders that are given by a commander in chief.” 

    JAGs often provide guidance to commanders and navigate them through U.S. and international laws relevant to military operations. John Richardson, a retired Navy officer and former chief of naval operations, praised the expertise JAGs offer the military at a Center For New American Security think tank event earlier this month.

    “I always wanted to have a very professional and knowledgeable and capable JAG corps,” Richardson said. “They need to win their case for the service and advise commanders how to do their jobs.”

    ]]>

    ¶¶¶¶¶

    ¶¶¶¶¶

    ¶¶¶¶¶

    ¶¶¶¶¶

    ¶¶¶¶¶