• North Korean group UNC1069 targets Node.js maintainers using fake LinkedIn and Slack profiles to spread malware and compromise open source packages.

    ¶¶¶¶¶

    ¶¶¶¶¶

    ¶¶¶¶¶

    ¶¶¶¶¶

    ¶¶¶¶¶

  • Even the simplest naval mines can strike fear into mariners or throttle traffic through a choke point, for no weapon has sunk more warships in the past 75 years. Yet the mines of the future will be far more capable and dangerous. 

    The integration of AI and robotic technologies will produce hybrid UUV-mines: versatile, intelligent,able to adapt to and overcome countermeasures. They will strike from the depths at targets on land, sea, and in the air.

    To counter them, militaries will need an equally new set of tactics and technologies: autonomous platforms, heterogeneous swarms, advanced sensor arrays, and modular architectures.

    The following is a “useful fiction” written in support of the NATO Centre for Maritime Research and Experimentation. The story blends non-fiction research on current and future trends and technologies with a fictionalized narrative scenario designed to promote reflection about the future of mine and countermine operations and autonomy in a maritime environment. 


    NATO Suspects Russians in Sinking of 4th Black Sea Grain Ship

    BRUSSELS—The Turkish-flagged cargo ship MV Golden Horizon ran aground in Romanian waters on Thursday, less than two hours after the 110-meter vessel was damaged by an underwater explosion. It was the latest of four vessels, all carrying Ukrainian agricultural products, to suffer similar damage in the Black Sea.

    NATO officials here say the pattern of attacks indicate a suspected Russian operation intended to set back a Ukraine still recovering from years of war. They could not, however, specify what sort of weapon might have caused the explosions. MV Golden Horizon, which had been bound for an undisclosed West African nation, ran aground in shallow coastal waters in full view of the Romanian Black Sea resort town of Mamaia.

    “Moscow wants to cut us off at the knees just as we are getting back on our feet,” said a Ukrainian military spokesman in Kyiv. “The Black Sea is a lifeline not just for our nation, but the world. Our agriculture exports feed people of all faiths and colors, and now we are all under attack again.” 

    A Russian spokesman denied that the Kremlin or its affiliated forces had any role in the incident. The spokesman said it was “a false-flag attack designed to besmirch Russia’s good name.”

    Endangering this route poses profound challenges for Ukraine, which exports foodstuffs worth roughly $30 billion a year. Growing uncertainty around this supply line has also begun to reverberate across the global economy. Ukraine remains the world's seventh-largest exporter of wheat, fourth-largest exporter of barley, and the biggest exporter of sunflower seeds, which are used for sunflower oil and animal feed. Its products are shipped to more than 40 countries where food prices have surged. 

    After Russia’s full invasion of Ukraine in 2022, foreign-flagged cargo ships carrying Ukraine’s grain harvest began to use the protected corridor that hugs the western coastline of the Black Sea. The route, too shallow for submarines, passes through the territorial waters of Romania and Bulgaria, both of which are NATO countries. That this vital export lifeline is now a zone of renewed conflict raises immense questions for the NATO alliance and Ukraine, which have led alliance leaders to agree to deploy a Maritime Task Force to protect the shipping and NATO-member territorial waters.

    “Commander, do not tell me this is the first time you’ve been to a spa?” Spanish Navy Capitán de Corbeta Carlos Echeverría spread his arms with a host’s sweeping welcome. 

    “My husband and I did an anniversary trip to one of Swansea’s finest last year. It was nice, but for some reason that one didn’t have the added option of a visit to a tactical operations center,” replied Cmdr. Heidi Bonner of the British Royal Navy. 

    Befitting a four-star resort, the Hotel Aqua’s two-story spa building was finished in mahogany and polished brass and overlooked the waters of the Black Sea. The luxurious setting was disturbed now by fiber cables, thick as an arm, snaking across the gravel paths. These cables linked to an Offset Antenna Farm hidden in the resort’s parking garage, providing connectivity back to Brussels, the capitals of the participant nations, and every ship and aerial asset deployed in nearby waters as part of the newly arrived NATO Maritime Task Force. 

    Bonner nodded complimentarily at her deputy, who stepped aside for her to enter first. “Very well done in getting this set up so quickly,” knowing how much work had gone into turning the off-season resort’s spa into a command center for their operation. 

    The hotel sat just outside Mamaia, a resort community on the Romanian seashore. It was a strange juxtaposition for the two officers, who were used to operating from crowded warships or cubicles at NATO’s Allied Maritime Command in Northwood, UK. 

    “To be honest, I would not have minded if they had assigned us to the casino,” Echeverría said. 

    “Our Task Force intel cell is already set up there on the top floor,” Bonner replied. “It fits. They all watch far too much James Bond.”

    The two officers had an easy repartee, but both felt the tension of their mission. The NATO task force was charged with securing the nearby sea lanes, which meant identifying and neutralizing the undersea threat that had all but closed off Black Sea shipping. The operations also carried the risk that whatever Russia was doing could cross into an Article 5 violation if any of the member-states’ ships were disabled or sunk. On top of that, there was the risk of an accident or skirmish with the growing number of Russian aerial drones and fighters that pestered the NATO forces. 

    “Where did they put the crew from the MV Golden Horizon?” Echeverría asked.

    “Also in the hotel wing linked to the casino,” Bonner said. “Wanted them near the intel folks.”

    “Smart,” said Echeverría, tapping his temple. “We’re about to get the UUV live feed up from the Golden Horizon.”

    “Let’s go,” she said, leaving him in her wake as they headed towards the spa’s dining area.

    Floor-to-ceiling windows were covered with light-blocking ballistic blankets against the threat of drones. Echeverría motioned for a sailor to bring up footage of the MV Golden Horizon’s latest UUV-conducted hull inspection.

    “Tell me what we know, Petty Officer Shanks,” Bonner said, arms crossed as she leaned forward to study the video.

    “Commander, the blast pattern on the hull indicates an external explosion,” replied the sailor, a young Canadian Navy petty officer 2nd class wearing wire-frame glasses. “We’re still modeling the size or yield of the explosive involved and will have that in less than 30 minutes. In terms of the source or cause, it is still a mystery to us. The waters in the area are too shallow for a submarine. No minefields are in the area; we’ve reconfirmed that with space assets.”

    “Could it be a limpet mine emplaced in port by a Russian diver or drone?” asked Bonner.

    “Highly unlikely based on the hull damage,” Echeverría said. “Bring up the close-up.”

    Shanks froze the feed and swiped back to earlier imagery. “The latest generation Russian limpet mines use a shaped charge and would punch a clean hole through the hull, targeting the fuel stores or something else that would set off secondary explosions. This rather large, jagged metal near the bow indicates something else. Notice also the size. It is much bigger than what a diver or small UUV could emplace.” 

    “Thank you to you both,” Bonner said.

    She closed her eyes and nodded, as if conversing with herself. Shanks looked confused, while Echeverría raised his eyebrows in anticipation, knowing a decision was about to come. The two NATO officers had deployed together twice in the past five years, once as part of a three-month Baltic mission focused on undersea cable surveillance and defenses and before that in the Persian Gulf supporting a U.S. task force that monitored illicit shipments to Iran. 

    “Let’s not get overly focused on the Golden Horizon,” she said, gesturing through the blackout curtains at the unseen hulking ship looming off the coast. “I want to know everything about the waters she was in, instead. By that, I mean we want to pull in as much data as we can, from every sensor we can access. All-domain NATO assets. OSINT. Buy what you need. And please don’t forget that our Ukrainian friends have quite a bit they can offer. If you’re having any problems with access, come see me, and we’ll break down that wall. Let’s get to it. There have been four attacks so far. If we could bet at the casino on it, a fifth would get at least even odds.”*

    “Es un misterio,” said Echeverría. 

    In the next few hours, the task force assembled as powerful a collection of data as Bonner had ever seen. In this AI-powered era of sensor fusion, she could bring together an array of NATO military surveillance sources –– from hyperspectral satellite sensors to surface and undersea sonar — and civilian sources like oceanographic data from environmental buoys, or the acoustic data picked up by fishing vessels hunting for their catch. 

    Yet Bonner and Echeverría frowned as they conferred in front of an oversized monitor that displayed a live tactical map of the Black Sea, with icons to mark current shipping and the four attack sites. 

    “There is no discernible pattern, " she said. "At all. No minefields that we detected. Moreover, the second and third explosions happened in specific lanes that had already been cleared or transited by multiple other ships.”

    “And it cannot be a submarine, as there is no vessel that can deploy in such shallow waters, nor one that could be in so many places at once,” Echeverría replied, gesturing in frustration at the screen as if shaming it into revealing a conclusion the task force’s AI mission analysis systems had been holding back.

    “It’s impressive work. Now, I need to get another look at the problem,” said Bonner, already on her way out of the operations center. 

    • • • 

    On her first deployment, aboard on HMS Somerset far too many years ago, Bonner had found that going on deck always helped clear her head. Breathing fresh sea air and feeling the wind on her face was the best tonic for a mind and body numbed by hours inside an ops center. 

    The resort was a far better setting to recharge than the heaving deck of a frigate, where a spray of icy North Sea water doused your face every few moments. Bonner walked along well-tended gravel pathways, taking in the view that had been the scene of many engagement proposals. The serenity of the mostly empty tourist beach and lapping waves, though, was broken by the sight of the disabled Ukrainian freighter ship only 200 meters away, its bow low in the water and the ship listing to port. She eyed the wrecked ship, wishing it would reveal the secret of what had struck it.

    A hundred meters further, a small fishing boat puttered past. Even from afar, she could tell the two men on board were related by the way they moved so fluidly together. The fishermen ignored the Romanian Navy RHIB standing guard at the wreck. They cared little for the freighter or what had happened to it, only that it was in the way of their catch.

    Life goes on, Bonner thought, even with war on their doorstep. This region’s history of conflict was something she had been thinking about a lot recently, and yet it was easy to lose sight of the simple fact that families like this had no choice but to live out their lives in the middle of that history. Sometimes, it was easier. Other times, it was more complicated. But time and life moved on as it did for everyone.

    Horse mackerel, she thought. Common enough fish here and likely what they were going out for. She might eat some at a local cafe if they ever cracked whatever was going on in the waters. In the hands of an able chef, it could make half-decent sushi.

    She found a recently painted bench and sat down. The fatigue of the rushed deployment and nonstop tempo nearly took her breath away. You had to face the fatigue head-on, acknowledge it, and know when it might be holding you back. 

    The small fishing boat set an anchor just beyond the RHIB, and the father and son unlimbered heavy-duty rods. They cast their jigs in increasingly wider arcs beyond their boat and out toward the Golden Horizon. By the way the light flashed off the silvery lures, Bonner suspected they were using feather rigs. The predatory mackerel devoured small fish and, in this wintery time of year, could be found closer to the coast hunting near the bottom.

    As her mind drifted, almost relaxing for a moment as she watched the long casts, an idea burst out of the moment of calm.

    Bait.

    Bonner leapt up and ran across the cross-cut manicured lawn back to her operations center.

    • • •

    Less than 24 hours later, Bonner and Echeverría flew low above the now lake-flat Black Sea aboard a Romanian IAR 330 Puma Naval Helicopter. Out the port side, she could see the Romanian Type 22 frigate Regele Ferdinand and a pair of RHIBs setting out from its stern at high speed toward the horizon. She knew the vessel: it was the former Royal Navy HMS Coventry. Since becoming the Romanian flagship in 2004—a few years before she graduated from the Royal Naval Academy—it had regularly supported allied operations in the Mediterranean.

    Bonner hunched over the ruggedized tablet in her lap, signaling to the crew chief that they were nearing the drop point for the pair of drones secured with stout tie-down straps. 

    The air suddenly shook around them and the Romanian helicopter banked left and down toward the ocean surface. Spray from the helicopter’s downdraft flew in every direction and created conditions that took Bonner back to a white-out she once experienced in the Barents Sea. 

    Amid the steep, lurching turn she dropped her tablet, and it went skittering across the floor of the helicopter before the crew chief stepped on it with his boot. The air around her vibrated and roared. It took a second to realize that the helicopter wasn’t disintegrating but rather being buffeted by the slipstream from a fighter jet’s high-speed pass. 

    “Russians,” one of the Romanian pilots called out over the radio, a declaration followed by what were a string of epithets recognizable even in a foreign language. 

    Bonner tightened her harness and cleared her throat. “Very well. Continue mission,” she said, extending a steady hand for her tablet. 

    A few minutes later, the crew chief nodded at Bonner, before opening the starboard door. Then he stepped back to make way for a pair of British sailors, who gingerly carried a 2-meter UUV towards the open door. Secured by safety lines, the sailors fought to stay on their feet as the helicopter slowed to hover a few meters above the sea's surface. The dart-like autonomous craft weighed not much more than a sonobuoy.

    This was the second one they had deployed from the helicopter, but just one of dozens launched into the glassy waters from RHIBs, patrol vessels, and other aircraft. 

    “Delta Two is wet!” one of the sailors called over the helicopter’s internal communications net.

    Bonner looked down as the drone slipped beneath the surface.

    “Confirmed Delta Two underway,” said the other sailor.

    “Well done. Now let’s let these robots dangle their lures.” Given the stakes of hundreds of sailors whose lives were on the line, it may have sounded like a flippant comment. Yet it was the most unambiguous expression of the tactics she wanted the wider NATO force to employ.

    The crew chief moved to secure the helicopter’s door, but Bonner waved him off. She preferred to have a direct view of the hunt going on below.

    The warships, RHIBs, autonomous aerial drones, space-based surveillance, and UUVs formed a web, controlled by a fusion of occasional human but mostly onboard AI guidance. In the helicopter, Bonner was in the center of their digital threads, nudging and tugging occasionally to orient them or assigning her team to reconcile technical setbacks, of which there were always a few. But far less with each deployment of the drones, she noted, because the mission-management software learned, as she did. 

    The composition of the UUV fleet beneath this 300-square-kilometer stretch of the Black Sea reflected the hard-won lessons of operations in the region during Russia’s war upon Ukraine and the hot peace that followed. It wasn’t just about numbers but the type. No one design could succeed at everything, and engineering was a discipline built around managing tradeoffs. One of the American 17-meter long-endurance surveillance drones carrying its own mini-UUVs looked everything like a miniature submarine ought to and outranged every other of its robotic peers. The lightweight British dart-shaped drones dropped from her helicopter were at the other end of the swarm, sprinting and drifting up and down thermoclines where they passively surveilled the area with acoustic sensors. By deploying undersea drones of different ranges, sonar and infrared sensor packages, and underlying operating systems –– as befitted the numerous platforms NATO member nations brought to the mission –– this heterogeneity became the swarm’s strength. 

    In the role of undersea hunters, this collection of UUVs could orient and pursue a larger goal as a pod or pack, coordinated semi-autonomously by Bonner and the onboard edge-AI mission computers that could receive limited guidance and reason the next steps they should take. Bonner thought of it like the way her own body and brain integrated her five senses – and the sixth of instinct or gut feeling that had proved her invaluable. This happened automatically, without focused thought in a manner that she had come to see as similar to how she conducted her missions today than when she first joined the Royal Navy. The basic laws of physics endured underwater: communications would remain a challenge until a quantum breakthrough arrived. Yet the creative application of AI and autonomy allowed undersea operations to work around it.

    In this case, the swarm of UUVs were not just hunting, but acting as bait. They were alternatively blasting out the acoustic signature of the Golden Horizon—harvested from the data records of the ships it had passed during its many transits of the region—and listening for a response. 

    Unlike the normal experience of fishing, the hunt was short. A multicolor image arrived on Bonner’s tablet screen—shared with her at the same time the meshed network of NATO UUVs shared it among themselves, overcoming the difficulty of undersea data transmission by playing a machine-speed version of the classic game of telephone. That same image was also being shared across the entire NATO task force’s battle network. 

    The data attached to the image indicated that it was one of many being shared at low bandwidth among the underwater UUVs and the surface vessels. It was a mosaic tile that, when combined with thousands of other past and present data sets, began to reveal a striking picture of what had been threatening the Black Sea shipping.

    The first sequence of data showed movement that had begun almost immediately after the sonic deception was initiated. Delta Three, a counterpart of the UUV deployed from their helicopter, was already closing in on the contact. It soon beamed back imagery of a cloudy swirl of dirt kicked up by something lifting from the seabed floor. A synthetic picture of the target began to fill in automatically by the visual models used by the battle management system to integrate all the other data being gathered by the UUV swarm’s varied sensors. It was like watching a digital sketch artist at work. 

    The display soon revealed a barrel-like shaped UUV, with a pair of ducted-propellor drive units on either side of its fuselage and a kind of tread on the bottom of its hull that apparently allowed it to creep along the seabed, much like those used by undersea pipeline inspection companies. A needle-like projection from its nose was clearly visible, and Bonner did not need the AI to tell her it was a contact-detonation device. 

    She opened a direct channel to Echeverría, who hunched over his tablet. “It’s a hybrid mine of sorts. Do you concur?”

    “Yes. It seems that the Russians stole an idea from the Ukrainian maritime drone program and further blurred the lines between commercial gear, mines, and UUVs.” 

    Echeverría used his tablet pen to circle a part of the image and zoom in. 

    “Look at the growth on the drone’s fuselage; it has clearly been sitting on the seabed for some time.”

    “Just waiting to deploy when the right freighter comes along,” Bonner said. “Or, at least, what sounds like a freighter.”

    She closed her eyes and sought peace amid the helicopter's noise. She considered how this new form of robotic attack represented just the latest twist in the tit-for-tat contest between undersea attackers and defenders that had gone on for more than a century. 

    After less than a second, her eyes opened up with a decision. 

    “It is a good bet this isn’t the only one. Pass the initial profile of this weapons system around the task force. Between knowing what we are hunting for and the bait that will draw its ilk out, we should be able to find any of its friends. I’ll propose up the chain of command that once we locate the rest, we employ a coordinated layered depth charge attack at each location.”

    “It looks like a full sweep may take up to eight hours, but I think we can mine the existing data from initial scans and halve that time by backcasting the target profile on that data,” said Echeverría, whose color had returned with the excitement of the hunt. “And using depth charges will generate a lot of noise.” 

    “It should, but I don’t think the Russians will complain. After all, that would be revealing they were the ones behind the attacks, wouldn’t it?” Bonner said as she tapped out updates to her real-time situation report. 

    She then let herself smile. NATO would soon bag a catch that would leave even those two fishermen jealous.

    P.W. Singer is Strategist at New America and the author of multiple books on technology and security. August Cole is associate fellow at the Royal United Services Institute in London, non-resident senior fellow at the Atlantic Council. They are co-founders of Useful Fiction.

    ]]>

    ¶¶¶¶¶

    ¶¶¶¶¶

    ¶¶¶¶¶

    ¶¶¶¶¶

    ¶¶¶¶¶

  • Following the high-profile supply chain compromise of the widely used Axios package, a highly coordinated social engineering campaign has been uncovered targeting top-tier Node.js and npm maintainers. Security researchers confirm that the Axios breach was part of a scalable operation aimed at infiltrating the global software supply chain. The threat actors are actively hunting developers […]

    The post Hackers Launch Social Engineering Offensive Against Key Node.js Maintainers appeared first on GBHackers Security | #1 Globally Trusted Cyber Security News Platform.

    ¶¶¶¶¶

    ¶¶¶¶¶

    ¶¶¶¶¶

    ¶¶¶¶¶

    ¶¶¶¶¶

  • In the dynamic and increasingly complex cybersecurity landscape of 2026, privileged accounts remain the most coveted targets for cybercriminals and malicious insiders alike. From system administrators and database managers to automated scripts and applications, these “digital crown jewels” hold the keys to an organization’s most sensitive data and critical infrastructure. A single compromised privileged credential […]

    The post Top 10 Best Privileged Access Management (PAM) Solutions 2026 appeared first on GBHackers Security | #1 Globally Trusted Cyber Security News Platform.

    ¶¶¶¶¶

    ¶¶¶¶¶

    ¶¶¶¶¶

    ¶¶¶¶¶

    ¶¶¶¶¶

  • In the rapidly evolving digital landscape of 2026, Identity and Access Management (IAM) has transcended its traditional role to become the foundational pillar of enterprise security. As organizations navigate the complexities of multi-cloud environments, remote workforces, burgeoning SaaS applications, and the relentless rise of cyber threats, the ability to accurately verify who (or what) is […]

    The post Top 10 Best Identity And Access Management (IAM) Companies 2026 appeared first on GBHackers Security | #1 Globally Trusted Cyber Security News Platform.

    ¶¶¶¶¶

    ¶¶¶¶¶

    ¶¶¶¶¶

    ¶¶¶¶¶

    ¶¶¶¶¶

  • A new investigation by Fairlinked e.V. claims that Microsoft-owned LinkedIn is running a massive, undisclosed corporate surveillance operation. According to the “BrowserGate” report, hidden code on LinkedIn’s website secretly scans the computers of its one billion users to detect installed software and browser extensions. This scanning reportedly happens without user consent, disclosure, or any mention […]

    The post LinkedIn Hidden Code Secretly Scans Users’ Computers for Installed Software appeared first on GBHackers Security | #1 Globally Trusted Cyber Security News Platform.

    ¶¶¶¶¶

    ¶¶¶¶¶

    ¶¶¶¶¶

    ¶¶¶¶¶

    ¶¶¶¶¶

  • Anthropic has officially shut down third-party AI agent access to its Claude subscription services, pulling the plug on unauthorized external integrations. This move marks a major shift in how developers and power users can interact with Claude’s frontier models outside the company’s official ecosystem. According to Anthropic executive Boris Cherny, the restriction takes effect today, […]

    The post Anthropic Ends Claude Subscription Access for Third-Party Tools Like OpenClaw appeared first on GBHackers Security | #1 Globally Trusted Cyber Security News Platform.

    ¶¶¶¶¶

    ¶¶¶¶¶

    ¶¶¶¶¶

    ¶¶¶¶¶

    ¶¶¶¶¶

  • Pentagon R&D spending would drop by about one-third under the White House’s 2027 defense-spending proposal—but the impact of that $4.5 billion reduction might be cushioned by the tech industry’s willingness to fund its own research.

    The proposed drop, which echoes a similar cut in the first Trump administration’s 2020 proposal, was outlined in Friday’s record-breaking $1.5 trillion defense-spending request. 

    Basic research spending would fall $3.7 billion from this year’s appropriated amount. Most of that—$2.6 billion—would be borne by the Space Force, but reductions would also hit the Army ($173 million), Navy ($529 million), Air Force ($150 million), and the Defense Department-wide account ($202 million).

    Applied research funding would drop by about $1.3 billion. The Army’s pool would drop by $1.312 billion while the Navy and Air Force would each lose $150 million. But the DOD-wide account would gain nearly $600 million and Space Force would edge up $56 million, both buoyed by Golden Dome missile-defense work.

    The documents released on Friday don’t provide any real explanation for decreasing research spending, although one alludes cryptically to “unnecessary spending and excessive bureaucracy” and “woke frivolities.”The new proposal comes as the White House has already worked to reduce non-defense spending on science and technology research —for example, by 22 percent in the fiscal year 2026 budget.

    “While the United States is dismantling the very foundations that have sustained our STEM and innovation leadership for generations, Beijing has announced its plans to continue accelerating its investments in science, technology, and innovation,” says a Nov. 5 letter from Rep. Raja Krishnamoorthi, D-Ill., ranking member of the House Select Committee on the CCP.

    China is increasing its spending on basic and applied research in a wide number of areas in what could be called dual-use technology. Its government says it allocated $569 billion for research and engineering last year. The number is in line with a broader trend of year-over-year increases that have boosted government-funded science spending to 23 times its 2000 level. 

    Decreases in U.S. government funding for military research and development don’t necessarily mean less basic and applied research funding overall—not when you factor in private-sector spending. Venture capital funding for new defense startups–which largely goes to R&D–is steadily rising.

    New and established technology companies that specialize in dual-use products spend more of their own money on R&D than do traditional defense contractors, KPMG reported in January. 

    Ukraine provides an excellent example of what a newly re-wired industrial base can look like. By some estimates, the country boasts more than a thousand defense startups that are finding customers across continents—and all with very limited government help. The Ukrainian government has allocated about $20 billion for military R&D this year. Ukrainian companies have leaned into information technology, rapid innovation, and continuous experimentation to produce new weapons on short timelines.

    Kurt Freshley, a former Marine who leads growth for technology company Valinor, says his company is “encouraged by signals that the Department wants to open the industrial base to new entrants.” 

    But Freshley said a larger topline for DOD doesn’t necessarily mean more money for new competitors.

    “The rewiring question will be answered not by the overall number, but by whether new entrants can compete and deliver,” he said. “If the procurement architecture actually creates room for new companies to compete, if this budget delivers on that, it's genuinely significant.”

    ]]>

    ¶¶¶¶¶

    ¶¶¶¶¶

    ¶¶¶¶¶

    ¶¶¶¶¶

    ¶¶¶¶¶

  • The White House wants nearly $65.8 billion for naval shipbuilding in fiscal 2027, up from about $45.1 billion it requested for the current fiscal year.

    If approved by Congress, the sum would pay for 18 warships and 16 “non-battle force ships,” according to documents released by the Office of Management and Budget on Friday. About $5.6 billion would come from a proposed reconciliation bill, the second in as many years, according to Pentagon documents released Friday. 

    “The 2027 Budget will establish President Trump’s Golden Fleet, including initial funding for the Trump-class battleship and next generation frigates, as well as increasing the capacity of public shipyards and improving overall ship production,” according to a White House fact sheet. 

    The shipbuilding request is part of a White House proposal to spend $1.5 trillion on defense in 2027, half again as much as this year’s record-breaking amount. The plan requests $1.15 trillion in regular appropriations plus the balance in a reconciliation bill.

    Funding for Columbia-class submarines—the missile boats that will replace the Ohios—would rise to $15.2 billion from the $9.3 billion appropriated in 2026. The sum would include $14.9 billion from the Defense Department’s budget and $205.7 million from the proposed reconciliation bill. The White House budget said $250 million would come from the National Sea-Based Deterrence Fund, created in 2014 to boost submarine construction with funds from outside the traditional shipbuilding budget. 

    The Pentagon documents also include $28.4 billion for “other warships,” such as Virginia-class submarines, aircraft carriers, destroyers, and $1.4 billion for the first next-generation frigate. About $1.9 billion would come from reconciliation. 

    The battleship would get $1 billion in advanced procurement funding for 2027. Other funding includes $13.9 billion for “auxiliaries, craft, and prior-year program costs,” and $8.3 billion for amphibious ships. 

    The proposed funding would also “maintain or increase” procurement of existing platforms from submarines to amphibious ships, according to White House budget summary. 

    The documents released on Friday do not list the types and quantities of the 18 battle force ships. 

    Landing Ship Mediums—of which six were listed in the Pentagon documents—were likely counted toward the warship total, said Mark Cancian, a budget expert and senior adviser with the Center for Strategic and International Studies. 

    “Still, nine other battle force ships in a single year is a good program, though they need to build more to reach the 350 battle force ships that the Navy has aimed for,” Cancian said.

    The 16 non-battle force ships include “strategic sealift vessels, hospital vessels, Consolidated Cargo Replenishment at Sea tankers, a special mission ship, submarine tenders and other vessels vital for logistics,” according to a White House budget summary document. 

    The White House summary said some of the requested 2027 funds would be used to increase the repair capacity of the nation’s four public shipyards. 

    The summary also highlights funding to design and develop the proposed battleship and new frigate. 

    “Those will involve a lot of development and won't be actually constructed for several years,” Cancian said. “What the Navy can do in the near term is build a lot of auxiliaries where the U.S. shipbuilding defense industry has some capacity.” 

    Brent Sadler, a senior fellow and naval expert with the Heritage Foundation, said the $65.8 billion shipbuilding topline should be carried into future years to increase production.

    "This is actually the closest to what is needed and it needs to be sustained for several budgets,” Sadler said, proposing legislation that includes a block order for warships the Navy plans to buy in the next five years, boosts worker salaries and provides a mechanism to place underperforming shipyards in a conservatorship. 

    But even with more funding, the challenge still lies in translating orders into production capacity in the foreseeable future. 

    That “requires a strategic industrial planning effort, beyond the Navy, to achieve and which the Department of the Navy still not fully organized to achieve nor is the interagency,” Sadler said. “New shipyards need to be funded with orders of new builds with longer delivery times as the goal is, firstly, to grow capacity,” which also means stockpiling key components to shrink supply delays.

    Lawmakers’ reaction to the proposed $1.5 trillion defense budget largely split along party lines. 

    Republican leaders of the congressional defense committee praised the proposal. 

    “These funds will drive the U.S. toward a defense budget of 5 percent of GDP–-a benchmark we have long supported as necessary to maintain our national defense. President Trump is also sending a clear signal for our allies and partners to build on recent progress and meet this benchmark alongside us,” Sen. Roger Wicker, R-Miss., and Rep. Mike Rogers, R-Ala., who chair the Senate and House Armed Services Committees, respectively, said in a statement. 

    Sen. Jack Reed, D-R.I., SASC’s ranking member, called the budget request “bloated” and “undisciplined.”

    “We must wisely invest in technology and efficiency.  We must learn the right lessons from Ukraine and Iran. The military has to adapt to changing threats and invest in smart, cost-effective, advanced technologies that strengthen our defensive capabilities and contribute to America’s economic and technological edge. We must also continue investing in our people and build up our defense manufacturing base to meet America’s needs now and in the future,” Reed said in a statement.

    ]]>

    ¶¶¶¶¶

    ¶¶¶¶¶

    ¶¶¶¶¶

    ¶¶¶¶¶

    ¶¶¶¶¶

  • The Trump administration is, once again, going all in on the development of the Air Force’s sixth-generation fighter while seeking only a fraction of its funding for the Navy’s future combat jet.

    The record-breaking $1.5 trillion 2027 defense spending request, released Friday, includes around $5 billion to develop the F-47, all from baseline discretionary funding. Just $140 million—$72 million of which is from a proposed reconciliation bill—is requested for the Navy’s own next-generation fighter, dubbed F/A-XX.

    “The Administration is sending a clear message to the nation’s adversaries by aggressively moving forward with the F-47 sixth-generation fighter: that the U.S. military will secure command of the skies, deter aggression, and project power anywhere on the globe,” the budget documents read. “The 2027 request continues to prioritize the rapid development and production of the F-47, and would achieve a first flight in 2028.”

    Last year, Congress initially committed only a fraction of the funding that would be needed to substantially advance the development of the F/A-XX. The service reportedly came close to choosing Boeing or Northrop Grumman to make the future aircraft, but no announcement was made. 

    But lawmakers’ support for the program soared in January, when House and Senate appropriators boosted F/A-XX funding more than tenfold, from $74 million to $897 million. Along with $750 million from the reconciliation bill, the Navy’s fighter saw nearly $1.7 billion in total enacted funding, according to the documents. 

    As part of the restored funding for F/A-XX, lawmakers wanted the details of the service’s acquisition strategy, spending plan, and timeline for awarding the manufacturing and development contract, fielding the aircraft, and reaching initial operating capacity. They also want an explanation of what prevented the Navy from spending F/A-XX funds allocated in previous years.

    By comparison, the F-47 received $2.5 billion in the 2026 budget request and $900 million in reconciliation funding. In total, the Boeing-built fighter netted $3.5 billion last year, the documents said.

    The budget request will also spend more on F-35s for the Air Force, Marine Corps, and Navy. In total, the White House is asking for 85 of the fifth-generation jets, with 32 funded by the discretionary budget and 53 by the proposed reconciliation bill, an Office of Management and Budget spokesperson confirmed to Defense One. Of the total, 38 would go to the Air Force, 37 to the Navy, and 10 to the Marine Corps.

    ]]>

    ¶¶¶¶¶

    ¶¶¶¶¶

    ¶¶¶¶¶

    ¶¶¶¶¶

    ¶¶¶¶¶