• A sophisticated backdoor malware targeting Internet of Things devices has surfaced, employing advanced communication techniques to maintain persistent access to compromised systems.

    The PolarEdge backdoor, first detected in January 2025, represents a significant evolution in IoT-focused threats, utilizing a custom TLS server implementation and proprietary binary protocol for command and control operations.

    The malware initially emerged through exploitation of CVE-2023-20118, a vulnerability affecting Cisco routers that enables remote code execution.

    Attackers leveraged this flaw to deploy web shells on target routers, establishing initial footholds for subsequent payload delivery.

    The attack chain involves downloading and executing a shell script named “q” via FTP, which then retrieves and launches the PolarEdge backdoor on compromised systems.

    PolarEdge demonstrates remarkable versatility in its target selection, with variants identified that specifically target Asus, QNAP, and Synology network devices.

    The malware’s sophisticated design suggests careful development aimed at establishing long-term presence within network infrastructure components.

    Its deployment pattern indicates coordinated campaigns originating from multiple IP addresses across different countries, all utilizing identical User-Agent HTTP headers during exploitation attempts.

    Sekoia analysts identified the malware’s complex architecture during detailed reverse engineering analysis, revealing a 1.6 MB ELF 64-bit executable that employs multiple operational modes.

    PolarEdge Backdoor configuration (Source – Sekoia)

    The backdoor functions primarily as a TLS server listening for incoming commands while simultaneously maintaining communication with command and control infrastructure through daily fingerprinting operations.

    Advanced TLS Implementation and Communication Protocol

    The PolarEdge backdoor’s most distinctive feature lies in its custom TLS server implementation built using mbedTLS v2.8.0 library.

    This approach represents a departure from conventional malware communication methods, providing encrypted channels that closely resemble legitimate network traffic.

    The TLS implementation utilizes multiple certificates including leaf certificates and certificate authority chains, creating an authentic-looking encrypted communication infrastructure.

    Section decryption algorithm (Source – Sekoia)

    The malware implements a proprietary binary protocol operating over the TLS connection, utilizing hardcoded tokens embedded within the executable’s data sections.

    This protocol requires specific magic values for request validation, including tokens stored in the malware’s configuration and others hardcoded within the binary.

    Command execution occurs when incoming requests contain the ASCII character “1” in the HasCommand field, followed by a two-byte length indicator and the actual command string.

    Fingerprinting operations run continuously in dedicated threads, collecting comprehensive system information including local IP addresses, MAC addresses, process identifiers, and device-specific details.

    This data gets transmitted to command and control servers using HTTP GET requests with specific query string formats.

    The malware constructs these requests using encrypted format strings that decode to reveal parameters such as device brand, module version, and collected system identifiers.

    The backdoor supports multiple operational modes beyond its default server functionality. Connect-back mode enables the malware to function as a TLS client for file download operations, while debug mode provides configuration update capabilities for command and control server addresses.

    These operational modes demonstrate the malware’s flexibility and the developers’ consideration for various deployment scenarios and maintenance requirements.

    Follow us on Google News, LinkedIn, and X to Get More Instant Updates, Set CSN as a Preferred Source in Google.

    The post PolarEdge With Custom TLS Server Uses Custom Binary Protocol for C2 Communication appeared first on Cyber Security News.

    ¶¶¶¶¶

    ¶¶¶¶¶

    ¶¶¶¶¶

    ¶¶¶¶¶

    ¶¶¶¶¶

  • Cybersecurity researchers have uncovered a sophisticated phishing campaign that weaponizes the NPM ecosystem through an unprecedented attack vector.

    Unlike traditional malicious package installations, this operation leverages the trusted unpkg.com CDN to deliver phishing scripts directly through browsers, targeting enterprise employees across 135+ organizations primarily in Europe’s industrial, technology, and energy sectors.

    The campaign, discovered in October 2025, represents a dangerous evolution in supply chain attack methodologies.

    Threat actors automated the creation of over 175 throwaway NPM packages, each serving as disposable hosting infrastructure for JavaScript code that automatically redirects victims to credential-harvesting websites.

    These packages follow specific naming patterns, including the “redirect-[a-z0-9]{6}” scheme and “mad-x.x.x.x.x.x” variants, making them appear legitimate within the NPM registry.

    Rather than compromising developers during traditional package installation processes, attackers distribute crafted HTML files disguised as business documents, invoices, and project files.

    When victims open these seemingly innocuous files, they trigger a chain reaction that loads malicious scripts from the unpkg.com CDN, exploiting the platform’s automatic availability feature for published packages.

    This approach transforms legitimate open-source hosting infrastructure into a phishing mechanism while bypassing conventional security measures.

    Snyk analysts identified additional package clusters beyond those initially reported by Socket, revealing the campaign’s extensive scope.

    The researchers noted that this attack demonstrates how threat actors are actively exploring new methods to weaponize the open-source ecosystem beyond conventional package-based exploits, representing a significant shift in supply chain compromise strategies.

    The malware exhibits sophisticated behavioral characteristics that enhance its stealth and effectiveness.

    Security check (Source – Snyk)

    Upon execution, the script presents victims with a fake “Cloudflare Security Check” interface, complete with anti-analysis countermeasures designed to evade detection and inspection.

    Advanced Evasion and Persistence Mechanisms

    The malicious payload incorporates multiple layers of protection against security analysis and detection.

    The code implements comprehensive anti-debugging measures through periodic developer tools detection, automatically blanking pages or redirecting when development consoles are accessed.

    This functionality operates through size threshold monitoring and console object manipulation:-

    const CHECK_INTERVAL = 600; 
    const SIZE_THRESHOLD = 160; 
    const REACTION = 'blank';
    
    function sizeCheck() {
        return (dw > SIZE_THRESHOLD) || (dh > SIZE_THRESHOLD);
    }
    
    function consoleCheck() {
        Object.defineProperty(obj, 'id', {
            get: function() {
                open = true;
                return '1';
            }
        });
        console.log(obj);
        return open;
    }

    Additionally, the malware disables standard browser inspection capabilities by intercepting keyboard shortcuts and context menu events.

    It prevents access to F12 developer tools, Ctrl+Shift+I inspector shortcuts, and Ctrl+U view source functionality through comprehensive event listener implementations.

    The script also employs frame-busting techniques, attempting to redirect the top-level window after victims interact with the fake verification checkbox, ensuring maximum impact regardless of the browsing context.

    Follow us on Google News, LinkedIn, and X to Get More Instant Updates, Set CSN as a Preferred Source in Google.

    The post New Cyberattack Leverages NPM Ecosystem to Infect Developers While Installing Packages appeared first on Cyber Security News.

    ¶¶¶¶¶

    ¶¶¶¶¶

    ¶¶¶¶¶

    ¶¶¶¶¶

    ¶¶¶¶¶

  • In its October 2025 Patch Tuesday release, Microsoft addressed a staggering 172 security vulnerabilities across its vast ecosystem, with four zero-day flaws stealing the spotlight, two of which are already being exploited in the wild. This massive security update targets a wide range of products, from Windows operating systems and Microsoft Office to Azure cloud […]

    The post Microsoft Patch Tuesday October 2025 – 172 Vulnerabilities Fixed Along with 4 Zero-days appeared first on GBHackers Security | #1 Globally Trusted Cyber Security News Platform.

    ¶¶¶¶¶

    ¶¶¶¶¶

    ¶¶¶¶¶

    ¶¶¶¶¶

    ¶¶¶¶¶

  • Cybercriminals have developed a sophisticated phishing campaign targeting Colombian users through fake judicial notifications, deploying a complex multi-stage malware delivery system that culminates in AsyncRAT infection.

    The campaign demonstrates an alarming evolution in social engineering tactics, leveraging legitimate-looking governmental communications to bypass traditional security measures and successfully compromise unsuspecting victims.

    The attack campaign employs carefully crafted Spanish-language emails impersonating official correspondence from “Juzgado 17 Civil Municipal del Circuito de Bogotá” (17th Municipal Civil Court of the Bogotá Circuit).

    These deceptive messages inform recipients of purported lawsuits filed against them, creating urgency and authenticity through formal legal language and institutional naming conventions.

    The malicious emails contain SVG (Scalable Vector Graphics) file attachments named “Fiscalia General De La Nacion Juzgado Civil 17.svg,” which translates to “Attorney General’s Office Civil Court 17.svg” in English.

    Upon execution, the SVG file presents victims with a sophisticated fake webpage masquerading as the Attorney General’s Office and Citizen’s Consultation Portal.

    The fraudulent interface includes fabricated elements such as judicial information systems and fake consultation registration numbers, enhancing the illusion of legitimacy.

    When users attempt to download what appears to be an official document, the system initiates a complex infection chain involving multiple file stages and encoding techniques.

    Seqrite analysts identified this malware campaign during their ongoing threat intelligence monitoring activities, detecting the sophisticated attack methodology that employs SVG files as initial attack vectors.

    The researchers noted that SVG files have become increasingly popular among cybercriminals due to their ability to embed malicious scripts within XML code structures, often evading detection by traditional security solutions that may not thoroughly scan these file types for harmful content.

    Infection Chain and Technical Implementation

    The malware’s infection mechanism demonstrates advanced technical sophistication through its multi-stage delivery process.

    Infection Chain of Campaign (Source – Seqrite)

    Once the victim clicks on the malicious SVG file, embedded JavaScript code executes the OpenDocument() function, which performs several critical operations to initiate the attack sequence.

    function OpenDocument() {
        // Accept base64 encoded embedded data
        // Decode it to attacker controlled "HTML" blob
        // Create a temporary URL object for that blob
        // Open that URL in new tab
    }

    The SVG file contains embedded base64-encoded data that, when decoded, creates an HTML blob displayed in a new browser tab.

    This secondary page presents a fake progress bar interface, convincing victims that a legitimate document download is occurring while simultaneously triggering the download of a malicious HTA file named “DOCUMENTO_OFICIAL_JUZGADO.HTA.”

    The HTA file serves as the next stage in the infection chain, containing heavily obfuscated code with large blocks of base64-encoded content.

    When executed, it decodes and drops a Visual Basic script file called “actualiza.vbs” onto the victim’s system.

    This VBS file, after removing extensive junk code designed to evade analysis, executes a PowerShell script contained within an obfuscated variable named “GftsOTSaty.”

    The PowerShell component (“veooZ.ps1”) connects to a dpaste domain URL to download an encoded text file called “Ysemg.txt.”

    This file undergoes multiple decoding processes, replacing specific character patterns before base64 decoding to produce “classlibrary3.dll,” a .NET assembly that functions as a module loader.

    The loader incorporates anti-virtual machine techniques, checking for VirtualBox and VMware-related processes to avoid detection in analysis environments.

    The final payload, AsyncRAT, gets injected into the legitimate MSBuild.exe process through sophisticated in-memory injection techniques.

    This approach allows the malware to operate within a trusted Windows process, effectively evading detection while maintaining persistence on the infected system.

    The AsyncRAT payload provides comprehensive remote access capabilities, including keystroke logging, system information gathering, webcam surveillance, and command-and-control communications through encrypted TLS connections using MessagePack serialization.

    Follow us on Google News, LinkedIn, and X to Get More Instant Updates, Set CSN as a Preferred Source in Google.

    The post Hackers Leverage Judicial Notifications to Deploy Info-Stealer Malware appeared first on Cyber Security News.

    ¶¶¶¶¶

    ¶¶¶¶¶

    ¶¶¶¶¶

    ¶¶¶¶¶

    ¶¶¶¶¶

  • In the days after Hamas’s October 2023 attack on Israel, U.S. troops in the Middle East began to endure near-daily drone attacks. It took six weeks to get upgraded counter-drone weapons to those far-flung outposts, the Army’s vice chief of staff said Tuesday—and the service’s procurement folks thought that was a win.

    To make it happen, Gen. James Mingus said, the service had to reprogram funds destined for the Raytheon Coyote Block 2+ to the Block C variant because each of those variants was a different line of funding in the defense budget.

    “It took 45 days, and everybody was patting themselves on the back…because normally that's a multi-month kind of process,” Mingus told an audience at the AUSA annual meeting in Washington, D.C. “If you're a kid at Tower 22, you're looking at your watch. Back here, we're looking at calendars.”

    The story illustrated a larger point the Army leaders have been trying to make in their acquisition-reform push: so-called “agile funding” would allow them not only to more rapidly buy new technologies, but immediately get them downrange to protect troops in imminent danger.

    “Had that been a single line of accounting, a single program element, we could have immediately…had those Coyote Block 2C’s in the hands of those soldiers in days, instead of a multi-month period,” Mingus said.

    As it stands now, if the Defense Department wants to shift more than $10 million slated to procure one weapon to buy another one, it needs approval from Congress. What the Army would like is a big pot of general counter-UAS money that it can use to buy new technology as it’s developed.

    It’s up to the Army, then, to assure Congress that they won’t be recklessly spending that pot of money without oversight.

    The challenge “is getting them to understand that they will maintain the visibility on this, because at the end of the day, that's a big concern,” Army Undersecretary Mike Obadal said. “They're responsible for overseeing the budget, and we can't ignore that.”

    Every new weapon fielded is going to have a tactical response from the enemy, Obadal said, often requiring yet another new piece of technology for the Army to keep an advantage. 

    “With exquisite weapon systems, that cycle may take years. With other things that may take months,” he said. “But with some of the things that our soldiers are going to face on the battlefield, it has to be days, or—to the vice’s point—even hours.”

    ]]>

    ¶¶¶¶¶

    ¶¶¶¶¶

    ¶¶¶¶¶

    ¶¶¶¶¶

    ¶¶¶¶¶

  • Fortinet has issued an urgent advisory revealing a critical weakness in its FortiPAM and FortiSwitch Manager products that could allow attackers to sidestep authentication entirely through brute-force methods.

    Tracked as CVE-2025-49201, the flaw stems from a weak authentication mechanism in the Web Application Delivery (WAD) and Graphical User Interface (GUI) components, classified under CWE-1390.

    With a CVSS v3.1 score of 7.4, rated as high severity, the vulnerability poses risks of unauthorized code execution or command injection, potentially granting remote attackers full control over affected systems.

    The issue affects multiple versions of FortiPAM, Fortinet’s privileged access management solution, and select releases of FortiSwitch Manager, which handles network switch configurations.

    Specifically, FortiPAM versions 1.5.0, 1.4.0 through 1.4.2, and all versions of 1.3, 1.2, 1.1, and 1.0 are vulnerable. For FortiSwitch Manager, versions 7.2.0 through 7.2.4 in the 7.2 series are impacted, while the 7.0 series remains unaffected.

    ProductAffected VersionsSolution
    FortiPAM 1.7Not affectedNot Applicable
    FortiPAM 1.6Not affectedNot Applicable
    FortiPAM 1.51.5.0Upgrade to 1.5.1 or above
    FortiPAM 1.41.4.0 through 1.4.2Upgrade to 1.4.3 or above
    FortiPAM 1.31.3 all versionsMigrate to a fixed release
    FortiPAM 1.21.2 all versionsMigrate to a fixed release
    FortiPAM 1.11.1 all versionsMigrate to a fixed release
    FortiPAM 1.01.0 all versionsMigrate to a fixed release
    FortiSwitchManager 7.27.2.0 through 7.2.4Upgrade to 7.2.5 or above
    FortiSwitchManager 7.0Not affectedNot Applicable

    Attackers require network access and could exploit this over time with persistent brute-force attempts, though no public exploits have surfaced yet.

    Fortinet urges immediate patching to mitigate threats. Users on vulnerable FortiPAM 1.5 should upgrade to 1.5.1 or later, while those on 1.4 need version 1.4.3 or above. For older branches like 1.3 and below, migration to a fixed release is essential.

    FortiSwitch Manager 7.2 users must update to 7.2.5 or higher. The company emphasizes monitoring for unusual login attempts and implementing multi-factor authentication as interim defenses.

    Discovered internally by Gwendal Guégniaud from Fortinet’s Product Security team, the vulnerability was published on October 14, 2025, under internal reference FG-IR-25-010.

    This disclosure comes amid rising concerns over supply chain attacks targeting network management tools, underscoring the need for swift updates in enterprise environments.

    Follow us on Google News, LinkedIn, and X for daily cybersecurity updates. Contact us to feature your stories.

    The post FortiPAM and FortiSwitch Manager Vulnerability Let Attackers Bypass Authentication Process appeared first on Cyber Security News.

    ¶¶¶¶¶

    ¶¶¶¶¶

    ¶¶¶¶¶

    ¶¶¶¶¶

    ¶¶¶¶¶

  • Fortinet disclosed a high-severity vulnerability in its FortiOS operating system on October 14, 2025, that could enable local authenticated attackers to execute arbitrary system commands.

    Tracked as CVE-2025-58325, the flaw stems from an incorrect provision of specified functionality (CWE-684) in the CLI component, potentially leading to privilege escalation.

    With a CVSS v3.1 score of 7.8 (AV:L/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H), it poses significant risks to enterprise networks relying on Fortinet’s firewalls and security appliances.

    FortiOS CLI Command Bypass Vulnerability

    The issue arises when a local attacker with high privileges crafts malicious CLI commands, bypassing intended restrictions to run unauthorized system-level operations.

    This could result in full control over the device, data exfiltration, or further network compromise. No remote exploitation is possible, but the low attack complexity and high impact make it a prime target for insiders or compromised accounts.

    Francois Ropert from Fortinet’s PSIRT team discovered the flaw. Affected platforms include high-end models like the 100E/101E series up to the 7000F, while others remain untouched.

    Organizations should verify their setups immediately, as exploitation requires only local access and no user interaction.

    Fortinet urges upgrades to patched releases. The following table outlines impacted versions and fixes:

    FortiOS VersionAffected BuildsRecommended Solution
    7.67.6.0Upgrade to 7.6.1 or above
    7.47.4.0 through 7.4.5Upgrade to 7.4.6 or above
    7.27.2.0 through 7.2.10Upgrade to 7.2.11 or above
    7.07.0.0 through 7.0.15Upgrade to 7.0.16 or above
    6.4All versionsMigrate to a fixed release

    Use Fortinet’s upgrade path tool for seamless transitions. No indicators of compromise (IoCs) or proof-of-concept exploits were released, but monitoring CLI logs for anomalies is advised.

    This incident, under FG-IR-24-361, underscores the need for least-privilege access in CLI management.

    Follow us on Google News, LinkedIn, and X for daily cybersecurity updates. Contact us to feature your stories.

    The post FortiOS CLI Command Bypass Vulnerability Let Attacker Execute System Commands appeared first on Cyber Security News.

    ¶¶¶¶¶

    ¶¶¶¶¶

    ¶¶¶¶¶

    ¶¶¶¶¶

    ¶¶¶¶¶

  • Microsoft rolled out its October 2025 Patch Tuesday updates, addressing a staggering 173 vulnerabilities across its ecosystem, including four zero-day flaws, of which two are actively exploited in the wild.

    This monthly security bulletin underscores the relentless pace of threat evolution, with critical remote code execution bugs in Office apps and elevation of privilege issues in Windows components dominating the fixes.

    As organizations grapple with end-of-support deadlines for legacy systems like Windows 10, timely patching remains essential to mitigate risks from state-sponsored actors and cybercriminals.​

    The updates target a broad array of products, from core Windows operating systems to Azure cloud services and the Microsoft Office suite.

    Among the highlights, Microsoft patched CVE-2025-59234 and CVE-2025-59236, both use-after-free vulnerabilities in Microsoft Office and Excel that enable remote code execution when users open malicious files.

    These flaws, rated critical with CVSS scores around 7.8, require no authentication and could allow attackers to gain full system control, potentially leading to data theft or ransomware deployment.

    Similarly, CVE-2025-49708 in the Microsoft Graphics Component exposes systems to privilege escalation over networks, exploiting memory corruption to bypass security boundaries.​

    Critical Vulnerabilities Patched

    Several critical entries demand immediate attention due to their potential for widespread exploitation.

    For instance, CVE-2025-59291 and CVE-2025-59292 involve external control of file paths in Azure Container Instances and Compute Gallery, allowing authorized attackers to escalate privileges locally and potentially compromise cloud workloads.

    These elevation of privilege bugs, also critical, highlight ongoing risks in hybrid environments where misconfigurations amplify impact.

    Another vulnerability is CVE-2016-9535, a long-standing LibTIFF heap buffer overflow re-addressed in this cycle, which could trigger remote code execution in image-processing scenarios, affecting legacy apps still in use.​

    The zero-days add urgency: CVE-2025-2884, an out-of-bounds read in TCG TPM2.0 reference implementation, stems from inadequate validation in cryptographic signing functions, leading to information disclosure. Publicly known via CERT/CC, it affects trusted platform modules integral to secure boot processes.

    Meanwhile, CVE-2025-47827 enables Secure Boot bypass in IGEL OS versions before 11 through improper signature verification, allowing crafted root filesystems to mount unverified images as a vector for persistent malware.

    CVE-2025-59230, another exploited flaw in Windows Remote Access Connection Manager, involves improper access controls for local privilege escalation.

    Microsoft confirms no public exploits for most others, but the duo’s active abuse by threat actors, such as nation-state groups, necessitates rapid deployment.​

    Deserialization issues in Windows Server Update Service (CVE-2025-59287) further elevate concerns, permitting unauthenticated remote code execution over networks, a prime target for supply-chain attacks.

    In total, the bulletin includes 11 critical remote code executions and elevations, with many tied to memory safety errors like use-after-free and buffer overflows prevalent in older codebases.

    Azure-specific fixes, such as those in CVE-2025-59285 for the Monitor Agent, address deserialization risks that could expose monitoring data to tampering.​

    Other Important Vulnerabilities Patched

    Beyond criticals, 150+ important vulnerabilities cover elevation of privilege (over 60), information disclosure (around 30), and denial-of-service flaws.

    Repeated patterns emerge in Windows PrintWorkflowUserSvc (CVE-2025-55684 through 55691), where use-after-free bugs allow local attackers to gain higher privileges during print operations, a common vector in enterprise printing environments.

    Windows Kernel vulnerabilities like CVE-2025-55693 and CVE-2025-59187 involve improper input validation, potentially leaking kernel memory or enabling ring-0 access.​

    Spoofing risks appear in CVE-2025-59239 for File Explorer and CVE-2025-59248 for Exchange Server, where flawed validation could trick users into executing malicious actions or bypassing authentication.

    BitLocker’s CVE-2025-55682 exposes a security feature bypass via physical attacks, underscoring hardware-software interplay vulnerabilities.

    For cloud users, Azure Arc and Connected Machine Agent fixes (CVE-2025-58724) mitigate local escalations from access control lapses. Denial-of-service bugs, such as CVE-2025-55698 in DirectX and CVE-2025-58729 in Local Session Manager, could disrupt services through null dereferences or invalid inputs.​

    This Patch Tuesday coincides with Windows 10’s end-of-support on October 14, 2025, amplifying the stakes for unpatched legacy deployments.

    Microsoft urges enabling automatic updates via Windows Update or WSUS, prioritizing criticals like Office RCEs first. For enterprises, vulnerability management tools can scan for affected versions, such as Office 2016-2021 or Windows 10/11 builds pre-KB503 something.

    No proof-of-concept code is publicly available for most, but indicators of compromise include anomalous Office crashes or Azure log anomalies. Experts recommend segmenting networks and monitoring for exploitation attempts post-patch.​

    Follow us on Google News, LinkedIn, and X for daily cybersecurity updates. Contact us to feature your stories.

      The post Microsoft October 2025 Patch Tuesday – 4 Zero-days and 172 Vulnerabilities Patched appeared first on Cyber Security News.

      ¶¶¶¶¶

      ¶¶¶¶¶

      ¶¶¶¶¶

      ¶¶¶¶¶

      ¶¶¶¶¶

    1. Microsoft officially ended support for Windows 10, marking the close of a decade-long era for one of the most popular operating systems in history.

      This means that as of today, the company will no longer deliver free security updates, feature enhancements, or technical assistance for the OS, leaving millions of devices potentially exposed to emerging threats.

      With Windows 10 powering around 43% of global Windows devices as recently as July 2025, the transition poses significant challenges for users who have yet to migrate.

      Microsoft urges immediate action, recommending either upgrading to Windows 11 for a more secure and efficient experience or enrolling in the Extended Security Updates (ESU) program for those needing extra time.​

      End of Support – Exposed to Cyber Attacks

      The discontinuation of support does not render Windows 10 PCs immediately unusable; they will continue to operate normally for basic tasks. However, without ongoing security patches, these systems become increasingly vulnerable to viruses, malware, and exploits targeting unpatched flaws.

      Microsoft has emphasized that post-October 14, 2025, no fixes will address new vulnerabilities, potentially slowing performance and disrupting compatibility with modern applications.

      Technical support from Microsoft customer service will also cease, forcing users to rely on third-party solutions or self-troubleshooting for any issues.

      Consumer advocacy groups like PIRG warn that this shift could lead to widespread security incidents, especially among the estimated 21 million UK users still on Windows 10. Over time, the lack of updates turns these devices into attractive targets for cybercriminals seeking to exploit outdated software.​

      For eligible devices, upgrading to Windows 11 remains the primary recommendation, offering free access if the PC meets minimum requirements like a 1 GHz processor, 4GB RAM, and TPM 2.0 support.

      Users can verify compatibility directly through Settings > Update & Security > Windows Update, where notifications may already prompt the process.

      Those whose hardware falls short face options like purchasing a new Windows 11 pre-installed PC, with tools available to match devices to specific needs.

      Alternatively, the one-year ESU program provides critical security updates for a fee, extending protection until October 13, 2026, ideal for businesses or individuals delaying full replacement. Dell and other manufacturers echo this advice, stressing backups via OneDrive before any upgrade to safeguard data.​

      The end of Windows 10 support highlights Microsoft’s push toward AI-integrated systems like Copilot+ PCs, but it raises environmental concerns as millions may discard functional hardware.

      Surveys indicate about 25% of users plan to stick with the OS despite risks, potentially amplifying global cybersecurity threats. In the cybersecurity realm, this transition could spike vulnerabilities in enterprise environments reliant on legacy systems.

      Microsoft positions Windows 11 as the secure future, but compatibility hurdles, such as Secure Boot requirements, may force widespread device refreshes.

      As the deadline passes today, experts predict a surge in upgrade queries and ESU enrollments to mitigate immediate dangers. Ultimately, staying supported requires proactive steps to avoid isolation from evolving digital protections.​

      Follow us on Google News, LinkedIn, and X for daily cybersecurity updates. Contact us to feature your stories.

      The post Support for Windows 10 Ends Today Leaving Users Vulnerable to Cyberattacks appeared first on Cyber Security News.

      ¶¶¶¶¶

      ¶¶¶¶¶

      ¶¶¶¶¶

      ¶¶¶¶¶

      ¶¶¶¶¶

    2. Threat actors with ties to China have been attributed to a novel campaign that compromised an ArcGIS system and turned it into a backdoor for more than a year. The activity, per ReliaQuest, is the handiwork of a Chinese state-sponsored hacking group called Flax Typhoon, which is also tracked as Ethereal Panda and RedJuliett. According to the U.S. government, it’s assessed to be a publicly-traded

      ¶¶¶¶¶

      ¶¶¶¶¶

      ¶¶¶¶¶

      ¶¶¶¶¶

      ¶¶¶¶¶